The global environmental agenda urgently needs a semantic web of knowledge

被引:21
作者
Balbi, Stefano [1 ,2 ]
Bagstad, Kenneth J. [3 ]
Magrach, Ainhoa [1 ,2 ]
Sanz, Maria Jose [1 ,2 ]
Aguilar-Amuchastegui, Naikoa [4 ]
Giupponi, Carlo [5 ]
Villa, Ferdinando [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country, Basque Ctr Climate Change BC3, Sci Campus,Sede Bldg 1,1st Floor, Leioa 48940, Bizkaia, Spain
[2] IKERBASQUE, Basque Fdn Sci, Plaza Euskadi 5, Bilbao 48009, Spain
[3] US Geol Survey, Geosci & Environm Change Sci Ctr, Box 25046, Denver, CO 80225 USA
[4] World Wildlife Fund, 1250 24th St,NW, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[5] Ca Foscari Univ Venice, Dept Econ, Venice, Italy
关键词
Global challenges; Sustainability; Artificial intelligence; Semantics; Knowledge integration and synthesis; ECOSYSTEM;
D O I
10.1186/s13750-022-00258-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Progress in key social-ecological challenges of the global environmental agenda (e.g., climate change, biodiversity conservation, Sustainable Development Goals) is hampered by a lack of integration and synthesis of existing scientific evidence. Facing a fast-increasing volume of data, information remains compartmentalized to pre-defined scales and fields, rarely building its way up to collective knowledge. Today's distributed corpus of human intelligence, including the scientific publication system, cannot be exploited with the efficiency needed to meet current evidence synthesis challenges; computer-based intelligence could assist this task. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based approaches underlain by semantics and machine reasoning offer a constructive way forward, but depend on greater understanding of these technologies by the science and policy communities and coordination of their use. By labelling web-based scientific information to become readable by both humans and computers, machines can search, organize, reuse, combine and synthesize information quickly and in novel ways. Modern open science infrastructure-i.e., public data and model repositories-is a useful starting point, but without shared semantics and common standards for machine actionable data and models, our collective ability to build, grow, and share a collective knowledge base will remain limited. The application of semantic and machine reasoning technologies by a broad community of scientists and decision makers will favour open synthesis to contribute and reuse knowledge and apply it toward decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Antoniou G., 2012, A Semantic Web Primer
[2]   An overview of the model integration process: From pre-integration assessment to testing [J].
Belete, Getachew F. ;
Voinov, Alexey ;
Laniak, Gerard F. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2017, 87 :49-63
[3]   Don't let industry write the rules for AI [J].
Benkler, Yochai .
NATURE, 2019, 569 (7755) :161-161
[4]  
Berners-Lee T., 2001, SCI AM, DOI [10.1109/5254.920597, DOI 10.1109/5254.920597]
[6]  
Borycz J, 2020, INF SERV USE, V40, P71, DOI [10.3233/ISU-200083, DOI 10.3233/ISU-200083]
[7]  
European Commission (EC), 2020, COM202067FINAL
[8]   Open Synthesis: on the need for evidence synthesis to embrace Open Science [J].
Haddaway, Neal R. .
ENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE, 2018, 7 (01)
[9]   SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY [J].
HEILER, S .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 1995, 27 (02) :271-273
[10]   Why the Data Train Needs Semantic Rails [J].
Janowicz, Krzysztof ;
van Harmelen, Frank ;
Hendler, James A. ;
Hitzler, Pascal .
AI MAGAZINE, 2015, 36 (01) :5-14