In Situ Direct Magnetic Loss Measurement With Improved Accuracy for Lossier Magnetics

被引:3
作者
Yi, Lifang [1 ]
Moon, Jinyeong [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Tallahassee, FL 32310 USA
关键词
Loss measurement; Timing; Magnetic hysteresis; Magnetic losses; Inductors; Mathematical models; Magnetic confinement; Converter; dc-dc; direct; < italic xmlns:ali="http:; www; niso; org; schemas; ali; 1; 0; xmlns:mml="http:; w3; 1998; Math; MathML" xmlns:xlink="http:; 1999; xlink" xmlns:xsi="http:; 2001; XMLSchema-instance"> in situ <; italic >; inductor; loss; magnetic; measurement; misalignment; power; skew; timing; TRANSFORMER;
D O I
10.1109/TIM.2022.3150877
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Magnetic loss often tops the power converter & x2019;s loss breakdown chart. The optimization of a magnetic component is, therefore, crucial in developing an efficient power converter. However, it is difficult to verify the design of magnetic components <italic>in situ</italic>, while they operate in the desired condition. The accurate, direct magnetic loss measurement is severely hindered by an uncertain timing skew between the measurement channels. This unknown timing skew could introduce an intolerable error in the measured magnetic loss. This article presents a novel method that avails the accurate, direct, and <italic>in situ</italic> magnetic loss measurement. An improved mathematical model of the measured magnetic loss in a power converter is developed with respect to the timing skew. Nonidealities in a practical magnetic component are also incorporated in the model for improved accuracy. The new method termed as triple-curve derivative (TCD) method is introduced and analyzed in detail to determine the actual timing skew and real magnetic loss with an enhanced accuracy, compared to the known methods. The TCD method is validated in simulation and verified in the experiment under various circuit design parameters based on a dc & x2013;dc step-down buck converter.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Analysis of Power Switching Losses Accounting Probe Modeling
    Ammous, Kaicar
    Morel, Herve
    Ammous, Anis
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2010, 59 (12) : 3218 - 3226
  • [2] Some General Remarks on the Dielectric Loss Mechanisms in Mineral Oils
    Bartnikas, R.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DIELECTRICS AND ELECTRICAL INSULATION, 2009, 16 (06) : 1506 - 1510
  • [3] Bolte Sven., 2016, 2016 18th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE'16 ECCE Europe), P1
  • [4] Conroy D. K., 1988, APEC '88: Third Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition. Conference Proceedings 1988 (Cat. No.88CH2504-9), P341, DOI 10.1109/APEC.1988.10582
  • [5] Step-Up DC-DC Converters: A Comprehensive Review of Voltage-Boosting Techniques, Topologies, and Applications
    Forouzesh, Mojtaba
    Siwakoti, Yam P.
    Gorji, Saman A.
    Blaabjerg, Frede
    Lehman, Brad
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2017, 32 (12) : 9143 - 9178
  • [6] Single-Phase T-Type Inverter Performance Benchmark Using Si IGBTs, SiC MOSFETs, and GaN HEMTs
    Gurpinar, Emre
    Castellazzi, Alberto
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2016, 31 (10) : 7148 - 7160
  • [7] Study of frequency domain dielectric properties of vegetable oil and mineral oil transformer
    Li, Linduo
    Ren, Qiaolin
    Xiao, Sa
    Yang, Wenyan
    Xiong, Wei
    Fu, Boqiao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING-JOE, 2019, (16): : 1599 - 1601
  • [8] Linkous R., 2000, APEC 2000. Fifteenth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (Cat. No.00CH37058), P633, DOI 10.1109/APEC.2000.822571
  • [9] High-Efficiency Impedance Control Network Resonant DC-DC Converter With Optimized Startup Control
    Lu, Jie
    Afridi, Khurram K.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2017, 53 (04) : 3880 - 3889
  • [10] Dielectric Loss Characteristics of Copper-Contaminated Transformer Oils
    Maina, R.
    Tumiatti, V.
    Pompili, M.
    Bartnikas, R.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY, 2010, 25 (03) : 1673 - 1677