Configural face processing impacts race disparities in humanization and trust

被引:30
作者
Cassidy, Brittany S. [1 ]
Krendl, Anne C. [1 ]
Stanko, Kathleen A. [1 ]
Rydell, Robert J. [1 ]
Young, Steven G. [2 ]
Hugenberg, Kurt [3 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, 1101 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] CUNY, Baruch Coll, Dept Psychol, 55 Lexington Ave, New York, NY 10010 USA
[3] Miami Univ, Dept Psychol, 90 North Patterson Ave, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
关键词
Race; Configural processing; Dehumanization; Trust; IN-GROUP; STEREOTYPE CONTENT; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; DEHUMANIZATION; INGROUP; OUTGROUP; MODEL; IDENTIFICATION; RESPONSIBILITY; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.018
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The dehumanization of Black Americans is an ongoing societal problem. Reducing configural face processing, a well-studied aspect of typical face encoding, decreases the activation of human-related concepts to White faces, suggesting that the extent that faces are configurally processed contributes to dehumanization. Because Black individuals are more dehumanized relative to White individuals, the current work examined how configural processing might contribute to their greater dehumanization Study 1 showed that inverting faces (which reduces configural processing) reduced the activation of human-related concepts toward Black more than White faces. Studies 2a and 2b showed that reducing configural processing affects dehumanization by decreasing trust and increasing homogeneity among Black versus White faces. Studies 3a-d showed that configural processing effects emerge in racial outgroups for whom untrustworthiness may be a more salient group stereotype (i.e., Black, but not Asian, faces). Study 4 provided evidence that these effects are specific to reduced configural processing versus more general perceptual disfluency. Reduced configural processing may thus contribute to the greater dehumanization of Black relative to White individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 124
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   The Roles of Dehumanization and Moral Outrage in Retributive Justice [J].
Bastian, Brock ;
Denson, Thomas F. ;
Haslam, Nick .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (04)
[2]   Blaming, praising, and protecting our humanity: The implications of everyday dehumanization for judgments of moral status [J].
Bastian, Brock ;
Laham, Simon M. ;
Wilson, Sam ;
Haslam, Nick ;
Koval, Peter .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 50 (03) :469-483
[3]   The missing link: Ingroup, outgroup and the human species [J].
Boccato, Giulio ;
Capozza, Dora ;
Falvo, Rossella ;
Durante, Federica .
SOCIAL COGNITION, 2008, 26 (02) :224-234
[4]   Dynamic neural mechanisms underlie race disparities in social cognition [J].
Cassidy, Brittany S. ;
Krendl, Anne C. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2016, 132 :238-246
[5]   Not quite human: Infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing [J].
Castano, Emanuele ;
Giner-Sorolla, Roger .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 90 (05) :804-819
[6]   What do I Care? Perceived Ingroup Responsibility and Dehumanization as Predictors of Empathy Felt for the Victim Group [J].
Cehajic, Sabina ;
Brown, Rupert ;
Gonzalez, Roberto .
GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2009, 12 (06) :715-729
[7]   The perceptual determinants of person construal: Reopening the social-cognitive toolbox [J].
Cloutier, J ;
Mason, MF ;
Macrae, CN .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 88 (06) :885-894
[8]   Who or what are you?: Facial orientation and person construal [J].
Cloutier, Jasmin ;
Macrae, C. Neil .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 37 (06) :1298-1309
[9]   Aid in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: Inferences of secondary emotions and intergroup helping [J].
Cuddy, Amy J. C. ;
Rock, Mindi S. ;
Norton, Michael I. .
GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2007, 10 (01) :107-118
[10]   The role of in-group identification in infra-humanization [J].
Demoulin, Stephanie ;
Cortes, Brezo P. ;
Viki, G. Tendayi ;
Rodriguez, Armando P. ;
Rodriguez, Ramon T. ;
Paladino, Maria Paola ;
Leyens, Jacques-Philippe .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 44 (01) :4-11