Green Product Supply Chain Coordination Under Demand Uncertainty

被引:19
作者
Xin, Chong [1 ]
Chen, Xin [1 ]
Chen, Haifeng [1 ]
Chen, Shuangrui [1 ]
Zhang, Meiqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Sch Business Adm, Shenyang 110169, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Supply chain; green product; green marketing; coordination; demand uncertainty; DUAL-CHANNEL; REVENUE; MODEL; SUSTAINABILITY; INFORMATION; MANAGEMENT; DECISIONS; CONTRACTS; POLICIES; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2963944
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The problem of coordinating a two-echelon green product supply chain with environmentally conscious consumers under demand uncertainty is studied in this paper. In the green product supply chain, a manufacturer produces green product through developing green technology and a retailer promotes the green product through green marketing. The demand of the green product is uncertain with the mean and the variance as the only known information. After analyzing the utility that a consumer gained from the green product, the problem is then formulated as a distribution-free-based Stackelberg game for a decentralized system under three contracts, i.e., wholesale price-only (WPO), revenue and green marketing cost-sharing (RGMS), and two-part tariff (TPTF) contracts. The analytical results are also proposed to show the effects of the system parameters on supply chain optimal decisions. By comparing with the centralized system, the coordination level for each contract is investigated. Numerical examples and sensitivity analysis with respect to several system parameters are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the contracts under demand uncertainty. The results demonstrate that both RGMS and TPTF contracts are superior to WPO contract. Especially, TPTF contract can always coordinate the supply chain, while RGMS contract can improve the supply chain coordination level only if the revenue and cost sharing coefficients satisfy certain conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:25877 / 25891
页数:15
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Revenue and promotional cost-sharing contract versus two-part tariff contract in coordinating sustainable supply chain systems with deteriorating items [J].
Bai, Qingguo ;
Chen, Mingyuan ;
Xu, Lei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2017, 187 :85-101
[2]   The distributionally robust newsvendor problem with dual sourcing under carbon tax and cap-and-trade regulations [J].
Bai, Qingguo ;
Chen, Mingyuan .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 98 :260-274
[3]   Comparative study of adaptability and flexibility in distributed manufacturing supply chains [J].
Chan, H. K. ;
Chan, F. T. S. .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2010, 48 (02) :331-341
[4]   Green marketing and its impact on supply chain management in industrial markets [J].
Chan, Hing Kai ;
He, Hongwei ;
Wang, William Y. C. .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2012, 41 (04) :557-562
[5]   Design for the environment: A quality-based model for green product development [J].
Chen, CL .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (02) :250-263
[6]   Proposal of a novel reference system for the green product development process (GPDP) [J].
de Medeiros, Janine Fleth ;
Lago, Nicole Cecchele ;
Colling, Camila ;
Duarte Ribeiro, Jose Luis ;
Marcon, Arthur .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 187 :984-995
[7]   Pricing strategy of environmental sustainable supply chain with internalizing externalities [J].
Ding, Huiping ;
Zhao, Qilan ;
An, Zhirong ;
Xu, Jia ;
Liu, Qian .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2015, 170 :563-575
[8]   THE DISTRIBUTION-FREE NEWSBOY PROBLEM - REVIEW AND EXTENSIONS [J].
GALLEGO, G ;
MOON, I .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1993, 44 (08) :825-834
[9]   Pricing decision for new and remanufactured product in a closed-loop supply chain with separate sales-channel [J].
Gan, Shu-San ;
Pujawan, I. Nyoman ;
Suparno ;
Widodo, Basuki .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2017, 190 :120-132
[10]   A comparative analysis of greening policies across supply chain structures [J].
Ghosh, Debabrata ;
Shah, Janat .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2012, 135 (02) :568-583