Group B Streptococcus real-time PCR may potentially reduce intrapartum maternal antibiotic treatment

被引:4
作者
Kugelman, Nir [1 ,2 ]
Kleifeld, Shiran [1 ,2 ]
Shaked-Mishan, Pninit [3 ]
Assaf, Wisam [1 ,2 ]
Marom, Inbal [1 ,2 ]
Cohen, Nadav [1 ,2 ]
Gruber, Maya [1 ,2 ]
Lavie, Ofer [1 ,2 ]
Waisman, Dan [2 ,4 ]
Kedar, Reuven [1 ,2 ]
Bardicef, Mordehai [1 ,2 ]
Damti, Amit [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Carmel Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Haifa, Israel
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Rappaport Fac Med, Haifa, Israel
[3] Carmel Hosp, Clin Serol & Virol Lab, Haifa, Israel
[4] Carmel Hosp, Dept Neonatol, Haifa, Israel
关键词
antibiotics; culture; group B streptococcus; intrapartum; PCR; screening; POLYMERASE-CHAIN-REACTION; DISEASE; COLONIZATION;
D O I
10.1111/ppe.12841
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Protocols for preventing early-onset group B streptococcal (GBS) neonatal infection may result in unnecessary antibiotics administration. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can provide a result within 30-60 min and has been found to be specific and sensitive for defining intrapartum GBS status. Objective To evaluate whether implementation of GBS fast real-time PCR to all women who require GBS prophylaxis may reduce the use of maternal prophylactic antibiotics. Methods This prospective cohort study included women admitted to a single delivery ward who required prophylactic antibiotics either due to a positive antepartum GBS culture screening performed at 35-37 weeks or due to an unknown GBS status with an intrapartum risk factor. All the women were tested by a double vaginal swab (real-time PCR and culture) as soon as it became apparent, they required antibiotic prophylaxis and prior to its administration. Results Between May 2019 and August 2020, 303 women met eligibility criteria and were enrolled, but four were excluded from the analysis due to failed culture or PCR tests. Of 299 women included in the study, 208 (69.5%) and 180 (60.2%) women, showed no evidence of GBS on intrapartum culture or PCR, respectively. Of 89 GBS antepartum carriers, 43 (48.3%) and 32 (35.9%) had negative intrapartum culture and PCR results, respectively. Of the 210 women with risk factors, 165 (78.5%) were culture negative and 148 (70.4%) had a negative PCR. Using intrapartum culture as the gold standard, intrapartum GBS real-time PCR was found to have a sensitivity of 97.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 92.3, 99.7) and a specificity of 85.6% (95% CI 80.1, 90.1). Conclusions Compared with antepartum universal culture screening or intrapartum risk-factor assessment, the need for maternal antibiotic treatment may be substantially reduced by implementation of intrapartum GBS real-time PCR, without compromising the sensitivity of GBS detection.
引用
收藏
页码:548 / 552
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[21]  
Verani JR., 2010, MMWR RECOMM REP MORB, V59, p1
[22]   The effect of screening-to-labor interval on the sensitivity of late-pregnancy culture in the prediction of group B streptococcus colonization at labor: A prospective multicenter cohort study [J].
Virranniemi, Minna ;
Raudaskoski, Tytti ;
Haapsamo, Mervi ;
Kauppila, Jaana ;
Renko, Marjo ;
Peltola, Joanna ;
Risteli, Leila ;
Laatio, Liisa .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (04) :494-499
[23]   While waiting for a vaccine: opportunities for optimization of neonatal group B streptococcal (GBS) disease prevention in Israel [J].
Waisman, Dan ;
Gover, Ayala ;
Molad, Michal ;
Kedar, Reuven ;
Rotschild, Avi ;
Benitz, William E. .
JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2019, 39 (02) :331-338
[24]   Evaluation of a rapid, real-time intrapartum group B streptococcus assay [J].
Young, Brett C. ;
Dodge, Laura E. ;
Gupta, Munish ;
Rhee, Julie S. ;
Hacker, Michele R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 205 (04) :372.e1-372.e6