Financial Payments by Orthopedic Device Makers to Orthopedic Surgeons

被引:38
作者
Hockenberry, Jason M. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Weigel, Paula [5 ]
Auerbach, Andrew [2 ]
Cram, Peter [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Hosp Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Gen Med, Iowa City, IA USA
[4] Iowa City Vet Affairs Med Syst, Comprehens Access & Delivery Res & Evaluat Ctr, Iowa City, IA USA
[5] Univ Iowa, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, Iowa City, IA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
KEY OPINION LEADERS; PHARMACEUTICAL-INDUSTRY; OF-INTEREST; PHYSICIANS; DISCLOSURE; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1001/archinternmed.2011.454
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: There is ongoing concern over potential conflict of interest inherent in physician relationships with industry. However, there are limited empirical data detailing the prevalence and magnitude of these relationships. Our objective was to use data made available by a US Department of Justice (DOJ) lawsuit to describe the extent of orthopedic surgeons' financial relationships with implant manufacturers. Methods: We used data made available by the 2007 DOJ settlement with 5 major joint implant manufacturers to detail the number of orthopedic surgeons receiving payments, the size of these payments, the aggregate dollar amount, and the proportion going to academically affiliated orthopedic surgeons between 2007 and 2010. Results: In 2007, 1041 payments totaling in excess of $198 million were made to 939 orthopedic surgeons. In 2008, following the DOJ settlement, the implant makers made 568 payments totaling more than $228 million to 526 orthopedic surgeons (which included $109 million in one-time royalty buyouts by a single firm). The proportion of surgeons receiving payments who had academic affiliations rose from 39.4% in 2007 to 44.9% in 2008. Similar patterns were observed in 2009 and 2010 for 3 firms that continued to disclose by choice. We also noted substantial variation across firms in the details provided in the disclosed data. Conclusions: The impact of the DOJ settlement in the short term appears complex, with an increase in payments, a decline in the number of consultants, and an increase in the proportion of consultants drawn from academia. There is a need for clearer specific requirements for disclosure to allow for meaningful long-term analyses to be performed.
引用
收藏
页码:1759 / 1765
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
AAOS opinions on ethics and professionalism, 1992, AAOS OP ETH PROF
[2]  
Abelson R., 2007, NY TIMES 0927, pC3
[3]  
[Anonymous], ZIMMER 2008 10 K FIL
[4]  
[Anonymous], NY TIMES 0510
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, MOD HEALTHC 0714, P28
[6]  
Armstrong D, 2009, WALL STREET J 0528, pA4
[7]   Relationships between academic institutions and industry in the life sciences - An industry survey [J].
Blumenthal, D ;
Causino, N ;
Campbell, E ;
Louis, KS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (06) :368-373
[8]  
Buckwell C, 2008, BRIT MED J, V336, P1404, DOI 10.1136/bmj.39541.731493.59
[9]   Financial relationships between institutional review board members and industry [J].
Campbell, Eric G. ;
Weissman, Joel S. ;
Vogeli, Christine ;
Clarridge, Brian R. ;
Abraham, Melissa ;
Marder, Jessica E. ;
Koski, Greg .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (22) :2321-2329
[10]  
Campbell Eric G, 2004, Account Res, V11, P103, DOI 10.1080/03050620490512296