Analyzing the Differences of Interaction and Engagement in a Smart Classroom and a Traditional Classroom

被引:15
作者
Yu, Huiju [1 ]
Shi, Gaojun [2 ]
Li, Jiaping [2 ]
Yang, Junfeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Normal Univ, Sch Marxism, Hangzhou 311121, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou Normal Univ, Sch Educ, Hangzhou 311121, Peoples R China
关键词
smart classroom; classroom interaction; traditional classroom; behavior coding method;
D O I
10.3390/su14138184
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Interaction in the classroom plays the key role for cultivating students' 21st century skills. Insufficient breadth of interaction, uneven interaction opportunities, and chaotic interaction existed in many classrooms. With the integration of technology into education, many smart classrooms were built, with one of the aims being to promote interaction. However, the differences of interaction behaviors and engagement in a smart class versus a traditional class could rarely be found in literature, especially with the same teacher lecturing in both classes. In this study, a quasi-experiment was conducted by one experienced English teacher lecturing in a smart classroom with students and a traditional classroom with students for one semester. Research data were obtained by coding the 8 class videos with the proposed "Classroom Interaction Analysis Framework" and the adapted engagement questionnaire, and the data were analyzed using SPSS 24. Results showed that there were no significant differences in either interpersonal interaction or human-technology interaction; however students experienced significantly more engagement in the smart classroom. The reasons were analyzed and interaction patterns in smart classroom were discussed. Finally, a smart classroom interaction model was proposed to promote classroom interaction by considering the interplay of pedagogy, space, and technology.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Understanding socio-technological challenges of smart classrooms using a systematic review
    Alfoudari, Aisha M.
    Durugbo, Christopher M.
    Aldhmour, Fairouz M.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2021, 173
  • [2] Interactivity in the classroom and its impact on learning
    Beauchamp, Gary
    Kennewell, Steve
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2010, 54 (03) : 759 - 766
  • [3] Chen W., 2011, CHINA ED TECHNOL, V8, P6
  • [4] Dong L., 2018, J DISTANCE ED, V36, P11, DOI [10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2018.06.007, DOI 10.15881/J.CNKI.CN33-1304/G4.2018.06.007]
  • [5] Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship
    Ertmer, Peggy A.
    Ottenbreit-Leftwich, Anne T.
    Sadik, Olgun
    Sendurur, Emine
    Sendurur, Polat
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2012, 59 (02) : 423 - 435
  • [6] Flanders N., 1970, ANAL TEACHER BEHAV
  • [7] He W., 2017, E ED RES, V11, P86
  • [8] Heron M., 2021, Meaningful Teaching Interaction at the Internationalised University, P3
  • [9] Huang Ronghuai, 2012, OPEN ED RES, V18, P22, DOI DOI 10.13966/J.CNKI.KFJYYJ.2012.02.008
  • [10] Jebur M.S., 2021, REV INT GEOGR ED ONL, V11, P1036