Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery

被引:66
|
作者
Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra [1 ,2 ]
Arora, Shilpkumar [4 ]
Lahewala, Sopan [5 ]
Kumar, Varun [4 ]
Shantha, Ghanshyam P. S. [6 ]
Jentzer, Jacob C. [1 ,2 ]
Stulak, John M. [3 ]
Gersh, Bernard J. [1 ]
Gulati, Rajiv [1 ]
Rihal, Charanjit S. [1 ]
Prasad, Abhiram [1 ]
Deshmukh, Abhishek J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Med, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Dept Med, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Robert Packer Hosp, Guthrie Clin, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Towanda, PA USA
[5] Jersey City Med Ctr, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Jersey City, NJ USA
[6] Univ Iowa, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Carver Coll Med, Iowa City, IA USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | 2018年 / 7卷 / 22期
关键词
cardiogenic shock; critical care; destination therapy; left ventricular assist device; mechanical circulatory support; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; HEART-FAILURE; BRIDGE; TRENDS; IMPLANTATION; MANAGEMENT; STATEMENT; SAFETY; CARE;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.118.010193
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-There are limited data on the role of temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices for cardiogenic shock before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery. This study sought to evaluate the trends of use and outcomes of MCS in cardiogenic shock before LVAD surgery. Methods and Results-This was a retrospective cohort study from 2005 to 2014 using the National Inpatient Sample (20% stratified sample of US hospitals). This study identified admissions undergoing LVAD surgery with preoperative cardiogenic shock. Admissions for other cardiac surgery and heart transplant were excluded. Temporary MCS was identified using administrative codes. The primary outcome was hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were hospital costs and lengths of stay in admissions with and without MCS use. In this 10-year period, 9753 admissions were identified with 40.6% requiring pre-LVAD MCS. There was a temporal increase in the frequency of cardiogenic shock associated with an increase in non-intra-aortic balloon pump MCS devices. The cohort receiving MCS had greater in-hospital myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmias, and use of coronary angiography. On multivariable analysis, older age, myocardial infarction, and need for MCS devices were independently predictive of higher in-hospital mortality. In 696 propensity-matched pairs, use of MCS was predictive of higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.4 [95% confidence interval 1.1-1.6]; P= 0.02) and higher hospital costs, but similar lengths of stay. Conclusions-In patients with cardiogenic shock bridged to LVAD therapy, there was a steady increase in preoperative MCS use. Use of MCS identified patients at higher risk for in-hospital mortality and greater resource utilization.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mechanical circulatory support in the treatment of cardiogenic shock
    Fernando, Shannon M.
    Price, Susanna
    Mathew, Rebecca
    Slutsky, Arthur S.
    Combes, Alain
    Brodie, Daniel
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 28 (04) : 434 - 441
  • [42] Peripartum Cardiogenic Shock and Mechanical Circulatory Support
    Botti, Giulia
    Thirunavukarasu, Sharmaine
    Ziviello, Francesca
    Chieffo, Alaide
    INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY-REVIEWS RESEARCH RESOURCES, 2023, 18
  • [43] Mechanical Circulatory Support With Impella Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device as a Bridge to Recovery in Takotsubo Syndrome Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock and Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction
    Beneduce, Alessandro
    Bertoldi, Letizia Fausta
    Melillo, Francesco
    Baldetti, Luca
    Spoladore, Roberto
    Slavich, Massimo
    Oppizzi, Michele
    Margonato, Alberto
    Pappalardo, Federico
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (04) : E30 - E31
  • [44] Temporary support strategies for cardiogenic shock: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, percutaneous ventricular assist devices and surgically placed extracorporeal ventricular assist devices
    Massey, Howard Todd
    Choi, Jae Hwan
    Maynes, Elizabeth J.
    Tchantchaleishvili, Vakhtang
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2019, 8 (01) : 32 - 43
  • [45] Advanced Preconditioning: Impella 5.5 Support for Decompensated Heart Failure Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery
    Konig, Tobias
    Hanke, Jasmin S.
    Dogan, Guenes
    Kempf, Tibor
    Sieweke, Jan-Thorben
    Schaefer, Andreas
    Bauersachs, Johann
    Schmitto, Jan D.
    Napp, L. Christian
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2021, 28 : S189 - S192
  • [46] Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock
    Werdan, Karl
    Gielen, Stephan
    Ebelt, Henning
    Hochman, Judith S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (03) : 156 - +
  • [47] The Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device in Severe Refractory Cardiogenic Shock
    Kar, Biswajit
    Gregoric, Igor D.
    Basra, Sukhdeep S.
    Idelchik, Gary M.
    Loyalka, Pranav
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (06) : 688 - 696
  • [48] Successful treatment of cardiogenic shock due to Takotsubo syndrome with implantation of a temporary microaxial left ventricular assist device in transaxillary approach
    Von Mackensen, Johanna K. R.
    El Shazly, Ahmed
    Schoenrath, Felix
    Kempfert, Joerg
    Starck, Christoph T.
    Potapov, Evgenij V.
    Jacobs, Stephan
    Falk, Volkmar
    Wert, Leonhard
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [49] Con: Impella Mechanical Circulatory Support Is Preferable to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock
    Khanna, Sandeep
    Trombetta, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2020, 34 (01) : 283 - 288
  • [50] Issues With the Design of Randomized Trials of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock
    Dalzell, Jonathan R.
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 147 (20) : 1489 - 1491