Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery

被引:66
|
作者
Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra [1 ,2 ]
Arora, Shilpkumar [4 ]
Lahewala, Sopan [5 ]
Kumar, Varun [4 ]
Shantha, Ghanshyam P. S. [6 ]
Jentzer, Jacob C. [1 ,2 ]
Stulak, John M. [3 ]
Gersh, Bernard J. [1 ]
Gulati, Rajiv [1 ]
Rihal, Charanjit S. [1 ]
Prasad, Abhiram [1 ]
Deshmukh, Abhishek J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Med, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Dept Med, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Robert Packer Hosp, Guthrie Clin, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Towanda, PA USA
[5] Jersey City Med Ctr, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Jersey City, NJ USA
[6] Univ Iowa, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Carver Coll Med, Iowa City, IA USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | 2018年 / 7卷 / 22期
关键词
cardiogenic shock; critical care; destination therapy; left ventricular assist device; mechanical circulatory support; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; HEART-FAILURE; BRIDGE; TRENDS; IMPLANTATION; MANAGEMENT; STATEMENT; SAFETY; CARE;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.118.010193
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-There are limited data on the role of temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices for cardiogenic shock before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery. This study sought to evaluate the trends of use and outcomes of MCS in cardiogenic shock before LVAD surgery. Methods and Results-This was a retrospective cohort study from 2005 to 2014 using the National Inpatient Sample (20% stratified sample of US hospitals). This study identified admissions undergoing LVAD surgery with preoperative cardiogenic shock. Admissions for other cardiac surgery and heart transplant were excluded. Temporary MCS was identified using administrative codes. The primary outcome was hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were hospital costs and lengths of stay in admissions with and without MCS use. In this 10-year period, 9753 admissions were identified with 40.6% requiring pre-LVAD MCS. There was a temporal increase in the frequency of cardiogenic shock associated with an increase in non-intra-aortic balloon pump MCS devices. The cohort receiving MCS had greater in-hospital myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmias, and use of coronary angiography. On multivariable analysis, older age, myocardial infarction, and need for MCS devices were independently predictive of higher in-hospital mortality. In 696 propensity-matched pairs, use of MCS was predictive of higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.4 [95% confidence interval 1.1-1.6]; P= 0.02) and higher hospital costs, but similar lengths of stay. Conclusions-In patients with cardiogenic shock bridged to LVAD therapy, there was a steady increase in preoperative MCS use. Use of MCS identified patients at higher risk for in-hospital mortality and greater resource utilization.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock: A Narrative Review
    Shah, Dhruv
    Sen, Jayshree
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (09)
  • [32] Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: Left, Right, and Biventricular Devices
    Dangl, Michael
    Albosta, Michael
    Butros, Hoda
    Loebe, Matthias
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2023, 19 (05) : 27 - 42
  • [33] Advances in temporary mechanical support for treatment of cardiogenic shock
    Koprivanac, Marijan
    Kelava, Marta
    Soltesz, Edward
    Smedira, Nicholas
    Kapadia, Samir
    Brzezinski, Anna
    Alansari, Shehab
    Moazami, Nader
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2015, 12 (06) : 689 - 702
  • [34] Review of Pathophysiology of Cardiogenic Shock and Escalation of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
    Pahuja, Mohit
    Yerasi, Charan
    Lam, Phillip H.
    Hashim, Hayder
    Ben-Dor, Itsik
    Bernardo, Nelson L.
    Satler, Lowell F.
    Sheikh, Farooq H.
    Najjar, Samer S.
    Molina, Ezequiel J.
    Waksman, Ron
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2023, 25 (04) : 213 - 227
  • [35] Percutaneous Left-Ventricular Support With the Impella-2.5-Assist Device in Acute Cardiogenic Shock Results of the Impella-EUROSHOCK-Registry
    Lauten, Alexander
    Engstrom, Annemarie E.
    Jung, Christian
    Empen, Klaus
    Erne, Paul
    Cook, Stephane
    Windecker, Stephan
    Bergmann, Martin W.
    Klingenberg, Roland
    Luescher, Thomas F.
    Haude, Michael
    Rulands, Dierk
    Butter, Christian
    Ullman, Bengt
    Hellgren, Laila
    Modena, Maria Grazia
    Pedrazzini, Giovanni
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    Figulla, Hans R.
    Ferrari, Markus
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2013, 6 (01) : 23 - 30
  • [36] Influence of implant strategy on the transition from temporary left ventricular assist device to durable mechanical circulatory support
    Meyer, A. L.
    Lewin, D.
    Billion, M.
    Hofmann, S.
    Netuka, I
    Belohlavek, J.
    Jawad, K.
    Saeed, D.
    Schmack, B.
    Rojas, S., V
    Gummert, J.
    Bernhardt, A.
    Faerber, G.
    Kooij, J.
    Meyns, B.
    Loforte, A.
    Pieri, M.
    Scandroglio, A. M.
    Akhyari, P.
    Szymanski, M. K.
    Moller, C. H.
    Gustafsson, F.
    Medina, M.
    Oezkur, M.
    Zimpfer, D.
    Krasivskyi, I
    Djordjevic, I
    Haneya, A.
    Stein, J.
    Lanmueller, P.
    Potapov, E., V
    Kremer, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2024, 66 (04)
  • [37] Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tan, Shien
    Low, Christopher
    Ng, Wei
    Ling, Ryan
    Tan, Chuen
    Lim, Shir
    Cherian, Robin
    Lin, Weiqin
    Shekar, Kiran
    Mitra, Saikat
    MacLaren, Graeme
    Ramanathan, Kollengode
    LIFE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (10):
  • [38] Temporary circulatory support for cardiogenic shock
    Combes, Alain
    Price, Susanna
    Slutsky, Arthur S.
    Brodie, Daniel
    LANCET, 2020, 396 (10245) : 199 - 212
  • [39] Complications of Temporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock: An Appraisal of Contemporary Literature
    Anna V. Subramaniam
    Gregory W. Barsness
    Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula
    Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
    Cardiology and Therapy, 2019, 8 : 211 - 228
  • [40] Complications of Temporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock: An Appraisal of Contemporary Literature
    Subramaniam, Anna V.
    Barsness, Gregory W.
    Vallabhajosyula, Saarwaani
    Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra
    CARDIOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2019, 8 (02) : 211 - 228