Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery

被引:66
|
作者
Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra [1 ,2 ]
Arora, Shilpkumar [4 ]
Lahewala, Sopan [5 ]
Kumar, Varun [4 ]
Shantha, Ghanshyam P. S. [6 ]
Jentzer, Jacob C. [1 ,2 ]
Stulak, John M. [3 ]
Gersh, Bernard J. [1 ]
Gulati, Rajiv [1 ]
Rihal, Charanjit S. [1 ]
Prasad, Abhiram [1 ]
Deshmukh, Abhishek J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Med, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Dept Med, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Robert Packer Hosp, Guthrie Clin, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Towanda, PA USA
[5] Jersey City Med Ctr, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Jersey City, NJ USA
[6] Univ Iowa, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Carver Coll Med, Iowa City, IA USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | 2018年 / 7卷 / 22期
关键词
cardiogenic shock; critical care; destination therapy; left ventricular assist device; mechanical circulatory support; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; HEART-FAILURE; BRIDGE; TRENDS; IMPLANTATION; MANAGEMENT; STATEMENT; SAFETY; CARE;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.118.010193
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-There are limited data on the role of temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices for cardiogenic shock before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery. This study sought to evaluate the trends of use and outcomes of MCS in cardiogenic shock before LVAD surgery. Methods and Results-This was a retrospective cohort study from 2005 to 2014 using the National Inpatient Sample (20% stratified sample of US hospitals). This study identified admissions undergoing LVAD surgery with preoperative cardiogenic shock. Admissions for other cardiac surgery and heart transplant were excluded. Temporary MCS was identified using administrative codes. The primary outcome was hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were hospital costs and lengths of stay in admissions with and without MCS use. In this 10-year period, 9753 admissions were identified with 40.6% requiring pre-LVAD MCS. There was a temporal increase in the frequency of cardiogenic shock associated with an increase in non-intra-aortic balloon pump MCS devices. The cohort receiving MCS had greater in-hospital myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmias, and use of coronary angiography. On multivariable analysis, older age, myocardial infarction, and need for MCS devices were independently predictive of higher in-hospital mortality. In 696 propensity-matched pairs, use of MCS was predictive of higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.4 [95% confidence interval 1.1-1.6]; P= 0.02) and higher hospital costs, but similar lengths of stay. Conclusions-In patients with cardiogenic shock bridged to LVAD therapy, there was a steady increase in preoperative MCS use. Use of MCS identified patients at higher risk for in-hospital mortality and greater resource utilization.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes with temporary mechanical circulatory support before minimally invasive centrifugal left ventricular assist device
    Sorensen, Erik N.
    Griffith, Bartley P.
    Feller, Erika D.
    Kaczorowski, David J.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2020, 35 (07) : 1539 - 1547
  • [2] Short-term mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to durable left ventricular assist device implantation in refractory cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    den Uil, Corstiaan A.
    Akin, Sakir
    Jewbali, Lucia S.
    Miranda, Dinis dos Reis
    Brugts, Jasper J.
    Constantinescu, Alina A.
    Kappetein, Arie Pieter
    Caliskan, Kadir
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 52 (01) : 14 - 25
  • [3] Outcome of Temporary Circulatory Support As a Bridge-to-Left Ventricular Assist Device Strategy in Cardiogenic Shock Patients
    Bidaut, Auriane
    Flecher, Erwan
    Nesseler, Nicolas
    Bounader, Karl
    Vincentelli, Andre
    Moussa, Mouhammed
    Delmas, Clement
    Porterie, Jean
    Nubret, Karine
    Pernot, Mathieu
    Kindo, Michel
    Schneider, Clement
    Gaudard, Philippe
    Rouviere, Philippe
    Michel, Magali
    Senage, Thomas
    Boignard, Aude
    Chavanon, Olivier
    Verdonk, Constance
    Para, Marylou
    Maille, Baptiste
    Gariboldi, Vlad
    Pozzi, Matteo
    Hugon-Vallet, Elisabeth
    Litzler, Pierre-Yves
    Anselme, Frederic
    Blanchart, Katrien
    Babatasi, Gerard
    Bielefeld, Marie
    Grosjean, Sandrine
    Radu, Costin
    Hamon, David
    Bourguignon, Thierry
    Genet, Thibaud
    Eschalier, Romain
    D'Ostrevy, Nicolas
    Nougue, Helene
    Martin, Anne Cecile
    Vanhuyse, Fabrice
    Blangy, Hugues
    Leclercq, Christophe
    Martins, Raphael P.
    Galand, Vincent
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (05) : E426 - E433
  • [4] Temporary Left Ventricular Assist Device Through an Axillary Access is a Promising Approach to Improve Outcomes in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Patients
    Doersch, Karen M.
    Tong, Carl W.
    Gongora, Enrique
    Konda, Subbareddy
    Sareyyupoglu, Basar
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2015, 61 (03) : 253 - 258
  • [5] Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock
    Touchan J.
    Guglin M.
    Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2017, 19 (10)
  • [6] Bridge to durable left ventricular assist device for refractory cardiogenic shock
    Yoshioka, Daisuke
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Garan, Arthur R.
    Topkara, Veli K.
    Han, Jiho
    Li, Boyganzi
    Kurlansky, Paul
    Yuzefpolskaya, Melana
    Colombo, Paolo C.
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Takeda, Koji
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 153 (04) : 752 - +
  • [7] Impella percutaneous left ventricular assist device as mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock: A retrospective analysis from a tertiary academic medical center
    Nouri, Shayan Nabavi
    Malick, Waqas
    Masoumi, Amirali
    Fried, Justin A.
    Topkara, Veli K.
    Brener, Michael I.
    Ahmad, Yousif
    Prasad, Megha
    Rabbani, LeRoy E.
    Takeda, Koji
    Karmpaliotis, Dimitrios
    Moses, Jeffrey W.
    Leon, Martin B.
    Kirtane, Ajay J.
    Garan, A. Reshad
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 99 (01) : 37 - 47
  • [8] Mechanical circulatory support for the right ventricle in combination with a left ventricular assist device
    Shimada, Shogo
    Nawata, Kan
    Kinoshita, Osamu
    Ono, Minoru
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2019, 16 (08) : 663 - 673
  • [9] Mechanical circulatory support for the right ventricle in the setting of a left ventricular assist device
    Steffen, Robert J.
    Halbreiner, M. Scott
    Zhang, Li
    Fukamachi, Kiyotaka
    Soltesz, Edward G.
    Starling, Randall C.
    Moazami, Nader
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2014, 11 (06) : 587 - 593
  • [10] Advances in Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Mechanical Circulatory Support
    Desai, Suneel Ramesh
    Hwang, Nian Chih
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2018, 32 (03) : 1193 - 1213