Evaluation of optimal urine screening and confirmation cut-off values for opiates, at a national reference laboratory

被引:1
|
作者
Karakukcu, Cigdem [1 ,2 ]
Ciraci, Mehmet Zahid [3 ]
Kocer, Derya [4 ]
Faydali, Mine Yuce [4 ]
Serdar, Muhittin Abdulkadir [5 ]
机构
[1] Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Biochem, Kayseri, Turkey
[2] Erciyes Univ, Drug Applicat & Res Ctr, Kayseri, Turkey
[3] Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Med Biochem, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Kayseri City Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Clin Biochem, Kayseri, Turkey
[5] Acibadem Univ, Dept Med Biochem, Ankara, Turkey
来源
TURKISH JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY-TURK BIYOKIMYA DERGISI | 2021年 / 46卷 / 05期
关键词
6-MAM; codeine; confirmation; cut-off; immunoassay; LC-MS/MS; morphine; opiate; screening; DRUG; IMMUNOASSAYS; EXCRETION; MORPHINE; CODEINE; ABUSE; 6-ACETYLMORPHINE; PERFORMANCE; RATES;
D O I
10.1515/tjb-2020-0614
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Objectives: To obtain optimal immunoassay screening and LC-MS/MS confirmation cut-offs for opiate group tests to reduce false positive (FP) and false negative (FN) rates. Methods: A total of 126 urine samples, -50 opiate screening negative, 76 positive according to the threshold of 300 ng/mL by CEDIA method - were confirmed by a full-validated in-house LC-MS/MS method. Sensitivity, specificity, FP, and FN rates were determined at cut-off concentrations of both 300 and 2,000 ng/mL formorphine and codeine, and 10 ng/mLfor heroinmetabolite 6-mono-acetyl-morphine (6-MAM). Results: All CEDIA opiate negative urine samples were negative for morphine, codeine and 6-MAM. Although sensitivity was 100% for each cut-off; specificity was 54.9% at CEDIA cut-off 300 ng/mL vs. LC-MS/MS cut-off 300 ng/mL and, 75% at CEDIA cut-off 2,000 ng/mL vs. LC-MS/MS cut-off 2,000 ng/mL. False positive rate was highest (45.1%) at CEDIA cut-off 300 ng/mL. At CEDIA cut-off 2,000 ng/mL vs. LC-MS/MS cut-off 300 ng/mL, specificity increased to 82.4% and FP rate decreased to 17.6%. All 6-MAM positive samples had CEDIA concentration >= 2,000 ng/mL. Conclusions: 2,000 ng/mL for screening and 300 ng/mL for confirmation cut-offs are the most efficient thresholds for the lowest rate of FP opiate results.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 602
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Comparative evaluation of five immunoassays for the analysis of alprazolam and triazolam metabolites in urine: Effect of lowering the screening and GC-MS cut-off values
    Fraser, AD
    Meatherall, R
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1996, 20 (04) : 217 - 223
  • [2] Urine analysis in monoclonal gammopathies at diagnosis: settling cut-off values
    Vidal-Pla, Monica
    Nuez-Zaragoza, Elisa
    Bhambi, Indira
    Aguadero, Vicente
    ADVANCES IN LABORATORY MEDICINE-AVANCES EN MEDICINA DE LABORATORIO, 2024, 5 (04): : 439 - 442
  • [3] Evaluation of capillary electrophoresis assay for CDT on SEBIA's Capillarys System: Intra and inter laboratory precision, reference interval and cut-off
    Schellenberg, Francois
    Wielders, Jos P. M.
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2010, 411 (23-24) : 1888 - 1893
  • [4] The optimal cut-off score of the Eating Attitude Test-26 for screening eating disorders in Japan
    Nohara, Nobuhiro
    Hiraide, Maiko
    Horie, Takeshi
    Takakura, Shu
    Hata, Tomokazu
    Sudo, Nobuyuki
    Yoshiuchi, Kazuhiro
    EATING AND WEIGHT DISORDERS-STUDIES ON ANOREXIA BULIMIA AND OBESITY, 2024, 29 (01)
  • [5] Determination of cut-off values for leucocytes and bacteria for urine flow cytometer (UF-100) in urinary tract infections
    Koken T.
    Aktepe O.C.
    Serteser M.
    Samli M.
    Kahraman A.
    Dogan N.
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2002, 34 (2) : 175 - 178
  • [6] Ultrasound evaluation of the fetal nasal bone: what is the most appropriate first-trimester cut-off point for aneuploidy screening?
    Gui Tarcisio Mazzoni
    Antônio Carlos Vieira Cabral
    Marcos Murilo de Lima Faria
    Mário Jorge Barreto Viegas Castro
    Magda de Carvalho Pires
    David Sidney Dantas Johnson
    Heverton Neves Pettersen
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2012, 285 : 1263 - 1270
  • [7] Ultrasound evaluation of the fetal nasal bone: what is the most appropriate first-trimester cut-off point for aneuploidy screening?
    Mazzoni, Gui Tarcisio, Jr.
    Vieira Cabral, Antonio Carlos
    de Lima Faria, Marcos Murilo
    Barreto Viegas Castro, Mario Jorge
    Pires, Magda de Carvalho
    Dantas Johnson, David Sidney
    Pettersen, Heverton Neves
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 285 (05) : 1263 - 1270
  • [8] Diagnostic yield of a one sample immunochemical test at different cut-off values in an organised screening programme for colorectal cancer
    Hamza, S.
    Dancourt, V.
    Lejeune, C.
    Bidan, J. M.
    Lepage, C.
    Faivre, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 (12) : 2727 - 2733
  • [9] Optimal Body Fat Percentage Cut-Off Values in Predicting the Obesity-Related Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study
    Macek, Pawel
    Biskup, Malgorzata
    Terek-Derszniak, Malgorzata
    Stachura, Michal
    Krol, Halina
    Gozdz, Stanislaw
    Zak, Marek
    DIABETES METABOLIC SYNDROME AND OBESITY, 2020, 13 : 1587 - 1597
  • [10] Determination of decisional cut-off values for the optimal diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis with a modified IFNγ assay (Bovigam®) in a low prevalence area in France
    Faye, Sandy
    Moyen, Jean-Louis
    Gares, Helene
    Benet, Jean-Jacques
    Garin-Bastuji, Bruno
    Boschiroli, Maria-Laura
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 151 (1-2) : 60 - 67