Effect of Environmental Measurement Uncertainty on Prediction of Evapotranspiration

被引:14
作者
Chen, Ling-Hsi [1 ]
Chen, Jiunyuan [2 ]
Chen, Chiachung [2 ]
机构
[1] Taichung Dist Agr Res & Extens Stn, Taichung 51544, Taiwan
[2] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Dept Bioind Mechatron Engn, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
来源
ATMOSPHERE | 2018年 / 9卷 / 10期
关键词
evapotranspiration model; sensors; uncertainty analysis; LEAF-AREA INDEX; MEDITERRANEAN CLIMATE; CROP TRANSPIRATION; SIMPLIFIED VERSION; SALINE WATER; MODEL; SENSITIVITY; CALIBRATION; ACCURACY; EQUATION;
D O I
10.3390/atmos9100400
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Evapotranspiration (ET) is a typical biological environmental process to influence leaf temperature, crop water requirement, and greenhouse microclimate. Affecting factors of ET include air temperature, air relative humidity, wind speed, solar radiation, longwave radiation, soil moisture, CO2 concentration, and crop state. In this study, two ET models of indoor cultivation commonly adopted in literature were selected to evaluate the effect of the performance of sensors on the model uncertainty. The method of the International Organization for Standardization, Guides to the expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (ISO GUM) was adopted. The result indicated that the performance of leaf area index (LAI) and solar radiation (Is) sensors were primary sources of uncertainty. The uncertainty of ET models due to sensor performance needs to be considered. To ensure the predictive ability for applying the ET model for crops irrigation management and greenhouse environmental control, the improvements in the measurement of environmental variables for calculating ET would be of particular importance. The method of this study can be used for evaluating the uncertainty of ET models that calculate ET based on environmental variables measured by meteorological sensors or the remote sensing technique.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Measurement Uncertainty in Clinical Validation Studies of Sensors
    Ansermino, John Mark
    Dumont, Guy Albert
    Ginsburg, Amy Sarah
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (06)
  • [32] Techniques for uncertainty analysis of complex measurement processes
    Atwood, CL
    Engelhardt, M
    JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 28 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [33] Hydrological model uncertainty due to spatial evapotranspiration estimation methods
    Yu, Xuan
    Lamacova, Anna
    Duffy, Christopher
    Kram, Pavel
    Hruska, Jakub
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2016, 90 : 90 - 101
  • [34] The nonlinear effect of effectuation and causation on new venture performance: The moderating effect of environmental uncertainty
    Peng, Xue Bing
    Liu, Yue Ling
    Jiao, Qi Qi
    Feng, Xiao Bin
    Zheng, Bei
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 117 : 112 - 123
  • [35] Assessing measurement uncertainty on trihalomethanes prediction through kinetic models in water supply systems
    Di Cristo, Cristiana
    Leopardi, Angelo
    de Marinis, Giovanni
    JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA, 2015, 64 (05): : 516 - 528
  • [36] Quantitative prediction of dynamic HTO migration behavior in the soil and non-negligible evapotranspiration effect
    Nie, Baojie
    Wu, Siyuan
    Yang, Derui
    Chen, Deyi
    Gu, Weiguo
    Zhou, Wentao
    Yin, Junlian
    Wang, Dezhong
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2022, 425
  • [37] Uncertainty Analysis and Data Fusion of Multi-Source Land Evapotranspiration Products Based on the TCH Method
    Cui, Zilong
    Zhang, Yuan
    Wang, Anzhi
    Wu, Jiabing
    Li, Chunbo
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [38] Analysis of the Effect of Uncertainty in Rainfall-Runoff Models on Simulation Results Using a Simple Uncertainty-Screening Method
    Shin, Mun-Ju
    Kim, Chung-Soo
    WATER, 2019, 11 (07):
  • [39] EXPRESSION OF THE UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT
    BORSIC, M
    STROJARSTVO, 1995, 37 (1-2): : 37 - 41
  • [40] Assessing uncertainty in measurement
    Gleser, LJ
    STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 13 (03) : 277 - 290