Assessment of long-term energy and environmental impacts of the cleaner technologies for brick production

被引:20
作者
Abbas, Akhtar [1 ]
Sajid, Muhammad Bilal [1 ]
Iftikhar, Muhammad Asaad [1 ]
Khoja, Asif Hussain [1 ]
Ahmad, Muhammad Muneeb [1 ]
Shahid, Muhammad [1 ]
Ullah, Kafait [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Sci & Technol NUST, US Pakistan Ctr Adv Studies Energy USPCAS E, H-12 Sect, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
关键词
Brick production; GHG emissions; Energy efficiency; Kiln scenario analysis; Cleaner technologies; LEAP MODEL APPLICATION; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; CARBON-MONOXIDE; POLLUTANT EMISSIONS; SULFUR-DIOXIDE; AIR-POLLUTION; CO2; EMISSIONS; PAKISTAN; ALTERNATIVES; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2021.10.072
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Brick kiln sector in South Asia contributes to nearly quarter of the global bricks production. Coal is the primary fuel used by this industry and its inefficient combustion process results in harmful pollutants contributing to deteriorating air quality, health problems in local communities, and greenhouse gas emissions. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of cleaner technologies and adoption pathways to achieve environment-friendly and energy-efficient production of bricks in Pakistan during 2019-2050. The study incorporates various timelines for (Zig-Zag Kilns) ZZKs and Vertical Shaft Brick Kilns (VSBKs) adoption, and the phasing out of conventional, Fixed Chimney Bull's Trench Kiln (FCBTKs). Low Emissions Analysis Platform (LEAP) based numerical calculations are performed to simulate brick production from 2019-2050 for seven different scenarios incorporating an assimilated technology mix of FCBTKs, ZZKs, and VSBKs. Emissions of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, black carbon, methane, non-methane volatile organic compounds, particulate matter, sulfur oxides and nitrogen oxides are considered in this study. The swiftness of energy demand, and emissions reductions are greatly impacted by the elimination of the conventional FCBTKs. By adopting clearner brick manufacturing, 365.5 million tons (21.8%) of GHG emissions reduction can be achieved. The annual social cost of using FCBTKs increases from 1.02 billion $ in 2019 to 1.88 billion $ in 2050. Cumulative fuel saving potential of retrofitting to ZZKs is 157 million tons (17.7%) and it offers nearly 0.92 billion $ (51%) savings in annual social cost for year 2050. Our study finds that early adoption of ZZKs would benefit more than delayed adoption of VSBKs. However, transition to ZZKi VSBK alone would not be sufficient to achieve net-zero carbon emissions. Carbon neutral fuels such as biomass and refuse-derived fuel (RDF) appear as an attractive option for deep decarbonization of this sector. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:7157 / 7169
页数:13
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] Review of GHG emissions in Pakistan compared to SAARC countries
    Abas, N.
    Kalair, A.
    Khan, N.
    Kalair, A. R.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 80 : 990 - 1016
  • [2] Air pollution tolerance index of plants around brick kilns in Rawalpindi, Pakistan
    Achakzai, Khanoranga
    Khalid, Sofia
    Adrees, Muhammad
    Bibi, Aasma
    Ali, Shafaqat
    Nawaz, Rab
    Rizwan, Muhammad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 190 : 252 - 258
  • [3] Modeling the nexus between carbon emissions, energy consumption, and economic progress in Pakistan: Evidence from cointegration and causality analysis
    Aftab, Samina
    Ahmed, Aftab
    Chandio, Abbas Ali
    Korankye, Bright Asiamah
    Ali, Aamir
    Fang, Wang
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2021, 7 : 4642 - 4658
  • [4] Ahmad S, 2018, NO NEW BRICK KILN BE
  • [5] Alcamo J., 2007, EUROPE CLIMATE CHANG, DOI [10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00250-9, DOI 10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00250-9]
  • [6] Techno-economic assessment and sustainability impact of hybrid energy systems in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan
    Ali, Mazhar
    Wazir, Rashid
    Imran, Kashif
    Ullah, Kafait
    Janjua, Abdul Kashif
    Ulasyar, Abasin
    Khattak, Abraiz
    Guerrero, Joseph M.
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2021, 7 : 2546 - 2562
  • [7] Impact of delay in reducing carbon dioxide emissions
    Allen, Myles R.
    Stocker, Thomas F.
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2014, 4 (01) : 23 - 26
  • [8] Andrew Eil E.S, 2020, DIRTY STACKS HIGH ST
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2019, State of Global Air 2019: A Special Report on Global Exposure to Air Pollution and its Disease Burden
  • [10] Analysis of energy security, environmental emission and fuel import costs under energy import reduction targets: A case of Pakistan
    Anwar, Javed
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 65 : 1065 - 1078