How do users respond to online rumor rebuttals?

被引:39
作者
Pal, Anjan [1 ]
Chua, Alton Y. K. [1 ]
Goh, Dion Hoe-Lian [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Wee Kim Wee Sch Commun & Informat, 31 Nanyang Link, Singapore 637718, Singapore
关键词
Online rumor; Rebuttal; Rebuttal acceptance; Stimulus-organism-response framework; Anchoring effect; Exposure sequence; ELABORATION LIKELIHOOD MODEL; SOCIAL MEDIA; PERSUASIVE MESSAGES; CONTINUANCE INTENTION; CONSUMPTION EMOTIONS; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; SPREADING MODEL; INFORMATION; ACCEPTANCE; REVIEWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2019.106243
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Underpinned by the Stimulus-Organism-Response framework and the anchoring effect, this paper investigates how perceived message properties of online rumor rebuttals are related to perceived utilitarian and hedonic values, which further could determine rebuttal acceptance. Given the possibility that Internet users can confront a rebuttal when they are not even aware of the rumor, this paper takes into account the role of exposure sequence as a moderator. Data were collected from 322 social media users in a between-participants experiment, which manipulated the exposure sequence. Partial least squares structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. Perceived message properties were positively associated with perceived utilitarian and hedonic values, both of which were positively related to rebuttal acceptance. Exposure sequence significantly moderated the underlying mechanism of rebuttal acceptance. This paper contributes to the online rebuttal literature by examining how individuals respond to rebuttals in terms of intention to believe and share such messages. It also has implications for practitioners and other Internet users.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How do short videos influence users' tourism intention? A study of key factors
    Liu, Jing
    Wang, Yujie
    Chang, Liyan
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [32] HOW JOURNALISTS AND SOCIAL MEDIA USERS PERCEIVE ONLINE FACT-CHECKING AND VERIFICATION SERVICES
    Brandtzaeg, Petter Bae
    Folstad, Asbjorn
    Chaparro-Dominguez, Maria-Angeles
    JOURNALISM PRACTICE, 2018, 12 (09) : 1109 - 1129
  • [33] How do Process Mining Users Act, Think, and Feel?
    Ammann, Jana
    Lohoff, Laura
    Wurm, Bastian
    Hess, Thomas
    BUSINESS & INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2025,
  • [34] Rumor recognition behavior of social media users in emergencies
    Ding, Xuejun
    Zhang, Xiaxia
    Fan, Ruoshi
    Xu, Qiaochu
    Hunt, Kyle
    Zhuang, Jun
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 7 (01) : 36 - 47
  • [35] Economic policy uncertainty and voluntary disclosures:How do Chinese firms respond?
    Lu, Cuicui
    Parsley, David
    Xue, Bing
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 92 : 141 - 167
  • [36] Pandemic and insurance purchase: How do people respond to unprecedented risk and uncertainty?
    Chen, Shuo
    Lin, Zhuoer
    Wang, Xuanyi
    Xu, Xian
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2023, 79
  • [37] How do online reviews affect purchasing intention?
    Lee, Sheng-Hsien
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2009, 3 (10): : 576 - 581
  • [38] The Rear Window Effect: How Users Respond to Political Discussions and Persuasive Discourses in Social Media
    Jorda, Beatriz
    Goyanes, Manuel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2022, 16 : 4361 - 4379
  • [39] How the government's punishment and individual's sensitivity affect the rumor spreading in online social networks
    Li, Dandan
    Ma, Jing
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2017, 469 : 284 - 292
  • [40] The Role of Likes: How Online Feedback Impacts Users' Mental Health
    Voggenreiter, Angelina
    Brandt, Sophie
    Putterer, Fabian
    Frings, Andreas
    Pfeffer, Juergen
    16TH ACM WEB SCIENCE CONFERENCE, WEBSCIENCE 2024, 2024, : 302 - 310