How do users respond to online rumor rebuttals?

被引:38
|
作者
Pal, Anjan [1 ]
Chua, Alton Y. K. [1 ]
Goh, Dion Hoe-Lian [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Wee Kim Wee Sch Commun & Informat, 31 Nanyang Link, Singapore 637718, Singapore
关键词
Online rumor; Rebuttal; Rebuttal acceptance; Stimulus-organism-response framework; Anchoring effect; Exposure sequence; ELABORATION LIKELIHOOD MODEL; SOCIAL MEDIA; PERSUASIVE MESSAGES; CONTINUANCE INTENTION; CONSUMPTION EMOTIONS; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; SPREADING MODEL; INFORMATION; ACCEPTANCE; REVIEWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2019.106243
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Underpinned by the Stimulus-Organism-Response framework and the anchoring effect, this paper investigates how perceived message properties of online rumor rebuttals are related to perceived utilitarian and hedonic values, which further could determine rebuttal acceptance. Given the possibility that Internet users can confront a rebuttal when they are not even aware of the rumor, this paper takes into account the role of exposure sequence as a moderator. Data were collected from 322 social media users in a between-participants experiment, which manipulated the exposure sequence. Partial least squares structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. Perceived message properties were positively associated with perceived utilitarian and hedonic values, both of which were positively related to rebuttal acceptance. Exposure sequence significantly moderated the underlying mechanism of rebuttal acceptance. This paper contributes to the online rebuttal literature by examining how individuals respond to rebuttals in terms of intention to believe and share such messages. It also has implications for practitioners and other Internet users.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How do online users respond to crowdsourced fact-checking?
    Panizza, Folco
    Ronzani, Piero
    Morisseau, Tiffany
    Mattavelli, Simone
    Martini, Carlo
    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [2] How do online users respond to crowdsourced fact-checking?
    Folco Panizza
    Piero Ronzani
    Tiffany Morisseau
    Simone Mattavelli
    Carlo Martini
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10
  • [3] Rumor has it: How do patients respond to patient-generated physician ratings?
    Bensnes, Simon
    Huitfeldt, Ingrid
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2021, 76
  • [4] Flaming, complaining, abstaining: How online users respond to privacy concerns
    Sheehan, KB
    Hoy, MG
    JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 1999, 28 (03) : 37 - 51
  • [5] HOW DO METHAMPHETAMINE USERS RESPOND TO CHANGES IN THE PRICE OF METHAMPHETAMINE AND HEROIN?
    Chalmers, Jenny
    Bradford, Deborah
    Jones, Craig
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2009, 28 : A9 - A10
  • [6] Sustainability Management of Hotels: How Do Customers Respond in Online Reviews?
    Brazyte, Karolina
    Weber, Fabian
    Schaffner, Dorothea
    JOURNAL OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HOSPITALITY & TOURISM, 2017, 18 (03) : 282 - 307
  • [7] How do Users Respond to Technostress? An Empirical Analysis of Proactive and Reactive Coping
    Weinert, Christoph
    Christian, Maier
    Laumer, Sven
    Weitzel, Tim
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 52ND ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2019, : 5103 - 5112
  • [8] Engaging with self-tracking applications: how do users respond to their performance data?
    Constantiou, Ioanna
    Mukkamala, Alivelu
    Sjoeklint, Mimmi
    Trier, Matthias
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 32 (06) : 941 - 961
  • [9] More than feelings? How Facebook reaction icons affect online users' behavioral intentions toward online health rumor posts
    Hou, Jian-Ren
    Kankham, Sarawut
    INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 32 (06) : 1978 - 2002
  • [10] How do oncology clinicians respond to patients about cancer misinformation found online?
    Bylund, Carma
    Mullis, Michaela
    Alpert, Jordan
    Markham, Merry-Jennifer
    Johnson, Skyler
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2023, 109 : 127 - 127