Faculty development for educators: a realist evaluation

被引:17
|
作者
Sorinola, Olanrewaju O. [1 ]
Thistlethwaite, Jill [2 ]
Davies, David [1 ]
Peile, Ed [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
Engagement; Faculty development; Medical education; Medical school; Motivation; Perception; Realist evaluation; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; STUDENT MOTIVATION; SCHOOL ENGAGEMENT; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s10459-014-9534-4
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The effectiveness of faculty development (FD) activities for educators in UK medical schools remains underexplored. This study used a realist approach to evaluate FD and to test the hypothesis that motivation, engagement and perception are key mechanisms of effective FD activities. The authors observed and interviewed 33 course participants at one UK medical school in 2012. An observed engagement scale scored participants' engagement while interviews explored motivation for attendance, engagement during the course and perception of relevance/usefulness. Six months later, using the realist framework, 12 interviews explored impact on learning outcomes/behavioural changes, the mechanisms that led to the changes and the context that facilitated those mechanisms. The authors derived bi-axial constructs for motivation, engagement and perception from two data-sources. The predominant motivation was individualistic rather than altruistic with no difference between external and internal motives. Realist evaluation showed engagement to be the key mechanism influencing learning; the contextual factor was participatory learning during the course. Six months later, engagement remained the key mechanism influencing learning/behavioural changes; the context was reflective practice. The main outcome reported was increased confidence in teaching and empowerment to utilise previously unrecognised teaching opportunities. Individual motivation drives FD participation; however engagement is the key causal mechanism underpinning learning as it induces deeper learning with different facilitating contexts at various time points. The metrics of motivation, engagement and perception, combined with the realist framework offers FD developers the potential to understand 'what works for whom, in what context and why'.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 401
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Faculty development for educators: a realist evaluation
    Olanrewaju O. Sorinola
    Jill Thistlethwaite
    David Davies
    Ed Peile
    Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2015, 20 : 385 - 401
  • [2] Realist evaluation of faculty development for medical educators: What works for whom and why in the long-term
    Sorinola, Olanrewaju O.
    Thistlethwaite, Jill
    Davies, David
    Peile, Ed
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2017, 39 (04) : 422 - 429
  • [3] Faculty development of medical educators: Training evaluation and key challenges
    Naing, Tun Tun
    Minamoto, Yuriko
    Aung, Ye Phyo
    Than, Marlar
    ASIA PACIFIC SCHOLAR, 2022, 7 (03): : 23 - 32
  • [4] Online faculty development in low- and middle-income countries for health professions educators: a rapid realist review
    Keiller, Lianne
    Nyoni, Champion
    van Wyk, Chantel
    HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [5] A systematic literature review of faculty development for teacher educators
    Phuong, Tam T.
    Cole, S. Catherine
    Zarestky, Jill
    HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 37 (02) : 373 - 389
  • [6] Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice in an Online Faculty Development Course for Anesthesia Educators in East Africa
    Kejela, Edosa
    Tesfaye, Gosa
    Getachew, Adane
    Rose, Elizabeth S.
    Winful, Taiye
    Eyayu, Zemene
    Martin, Marie H.
    Sileshi, Bantayehu
    JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2023, 43 (04) : 274 - 278
  • [7] The American Society of Hematology (ASH) Medical Educators Institute: a Pilot Faculty Development Project for Hematology Educators
    Jennifer C. Kesselheim
    Charles P. Clayton
    Josel Fritz
    Roy E. Smith
    Scott D. Gitlin
    Erin Reid
    Kenneth S. Zuckerman
    Marc J. Kahn
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2019, 34 : 719 - 724
  • [8] The American Society of Hematology (ASH) Medical Educators Institute: a Pilot Faculty Development Project for Hematology Educators
    Kesselheim, Jennifer C.
    Clayton, Charles P.
    Fritz, Josel
    Smith, Roy E.
    Gitlin, Scott D.
    Reid, Erin
    Zuckerman, Kenneth S.
    Kahn, Marc J.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2019, 34 (04) : 719 - 724
  • [9] The Quality and Safety Educators Academy: Fulfilling an Unmet Need for Faculty Development
    Myers, Jennifer S.
    Tess, Anjala
    Glasheen, Jeffrey J.
    O'Malley, Cheryl
    Baum, Karyn D.
    Fisher, Erin Stucky
    O'Leary, Kevin J.
    Spencer, Abby
    Warm, Eric
    Wiese, Jeffrey
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2014, 29 (01) : 5 - 12
  • [10] A Qualitative Evaluation of a Clinical Faculty Mentorship Program Using a Realist Evaluation Approach
    McDaniel, Corrie E.
    Rooholamini, Sahar N.
    Desai, Arti D.
    Reddy, Sandeep
    Marshall, Susan G.
    ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2020, 20 (01) : 104 - 112