Analysis of truck drivers' unsafe driving behaviors using four machine learning methods

被引:27
作者
Niu, Yi [1 ]
Li, Zhenming [2 ]
Fan, Yunxiao [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci Beijing, Sch Engn & Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Dept Safety Engn, Hangzhou 310014, Peoples R China
关键词
Truck drivers; Unsafe driving behavior; Classification framework; Machine learning; INJURY SEVERITY; SAFETY CLIMATE; ACCIDENTS; ATTITUDES; YOUNG; RISK; RULE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103192
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Unsafe driving behaviors are the leading causes of truck crashes. Therefore, an enhanced understanding of truck drivers' unsafe driving behaviors is of considerable significance for preventing truck crashes. However, previous studies have rarely encompassed proactive factors such as safety management. Therefore, a classification framework for truck drivers' unsafe driving behaviors was established according to a survey of 2000 truck drivers using four machine learning models (CART, RT, AdaBoost, and GBDT). The classification framework included six first-level input dimensions, 51 s-level input indicators, covering both objective and proactive factors. Nine types of unsafe driving behaviors were determined as outputs. Unique risk factors associated with each of nine unsafe driving behaviors were identified. The results showed that the model's predictive performance varies with different driving behaviors (Classification Accuracy ranges from 0.64 to 0.95, F1-score ranges from 0.52 to 0.72), which was caused by different formation mechanisms of different driving behaviors. Similarly, the results related to factor importance for different driving behaviors were also significantly different, regardless of the first-level and second-level factors. Furthermore, the correlation analysis and OR value strengthened the interpretability of the factor importance, revealing possible reasons for the differences between various driving behaviors.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Analysis of traffic accident severity using Decision Rules via Decision Trees [J].
Abellan, Joaquin ;
Lopez, Griselda ;
de Ona, Juan .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 40 (15) :6047-6054
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, IEEE Trans. Broadcast.
[3]   Severity analysis for large truck rollover crashes using a random parameter ordered logit model [J].
Azimi, Ghazaleh ;
Rahimi, Alireza ;
Asgari, Hamidreza ;
Jin, Xia .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2020, 135
[4]   BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS AND COMPLIANCE WITH SAFETY REGULATIONS [J].
BATTMANN, W ;
KLUMB, P .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 1993, 16 (01) :35-46
[5]   Multilevel Assessment of the Impact of Rain on Drivers' Behavior Standardized Methodology and Empirical Analysis [J].
Billot, Romain ;
El Faouzi, Nour-Eddin ;
De Vuyst, Florian .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2009, (2107) :134-142
[6]   Factors underpinning unsafe driving: A systematic literature review of car drivers [J].
Bowen, Louise ;
Budden, Shannon L. ;
Smith, Andrew P. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2020, 72 :184-210
[7]  
Breiman L., 1997, Tech Report. 486
[8]   The relationships between organizational and individual variables to on-the-job driver accidents and accident-free kilometres [J].
Caird, JK ;
Kline, TJ .
ERGONOMICS, 2004, 47 (15) :1598-1613
[9]   Road traffic accidents: An overview of data sources, analysis techniques and contributing factors [J].
Chand, Arun ;
Jayesh, S. ;
Bhasi, A. B. .
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 47 :5135-5141
[10]   Analysis of driver injury severity in truck-involved accidents using a non-parametric classification tree model [J].
Chang, Li-Yen ;
Chien, Jui-Tseng .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2013, 51 (01) :17-22