Tamsulosin or Silodosin Adjuvant Treatment Is Ineffective in Improving Shockwave Lithotripsy Outcome: A Short-Term Follow-Up Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

被引:14
作者
De Nunzio, Cosimo [1 ]
Brassetti, Aldo [1 ]
Bellangino, Mariangela [1 ]
Trucchi, Alberto [1 ]
Petta, Stefano [1 ]
Presicce, Fabrizio [1 ]
Tubaro, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, St Andrea Hosp, Dept Urol, Via Conca DOro 206, I-00141 Rome, Italy
关键词
MEDICAL EXPULSIVE THERAPY; DISTAL URETERAL CALCULI; WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; STONE CLEARANCE; RENAL STONES; METAANALYSIS; EFFICACY; MANAGEMENT; SAFETY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1089/end.2016.0113
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The role of alpha-blockers after shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is controversial. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of tamsulosin and silodosin after SWL for kidney stones. Methods: From 2012 onward, a consecutive series of patients undergoing SWL were prospectively enrolled and randomized by closed envelopes in three groups receiving tamsulosin 0.4 mg (A), silodosin 8mg (B), and placebo (C) daily for 21 days after SWL. Anthropometrics, stone size, and location were recorded before SWL. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score was collected at 6, 12, and 24 hours after treatment to evaluate patients' discomfort. Stone-free rate was assessed 1 and 3 weeks postoperatively. Complications and medical treatmentrelated adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Differences in VAS score, stone-free rate, and complications were compared among the groups. Results: Overall, 60 patients were enrolled. Mean stone sizes were 10.28 -2.46 mm, 10.45 -1.73 mm, and 9.23 -2.04mm in groups A, B, and C, respectively (p = 0.474). There was no significant difference between the three groups with regard to stone location. Comparable energy was used to treat patients from the three groups. The overall 3-week stone-free rate was 53%: 58% in the tamsulosin group, 47% in the silodosin group, and 55% in the placebo group (p = 0.399). No significant differences were observed in the VAS scores reported by the groups at 6 hours (p = 1.254), 12 hours (p = 0.075), and 24 hours (p = 0.490). Overall, 12 complications were reported: 11 patients (7 in group C and 4 in group B) needed analgesics for colic, and 1 patient (group B) was surgically treated for Steinstrasse. Tamsulosin was superior to placebo (p = 0.008) and silodosin (p = 0.021) in preventing complications; no difference between silodosin and placebo (p = 0.629) was noted. Conclusions: Tamsulosin and silodosin are ineffective in increasing stone-free rate as well as early patients' discomfort after extracorporeal lithotripsy.
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 821
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Statistical power and analytical quantification [J].
Araujo, Pedro ;
Froyland, Livar .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES, 2007, 847 (02) :305-308
[2]   Is there a role for tamsulosin in shock wave lithotripsy for renal and ureteral calculi? [J].
Bhagat, Suresh K. ;
Chacko, Ninan K. ;
Kekre, Nitin S. ;
Gopalakrishnan, Ganesh ;
Antonisamy, Belavendra ;
Devasia, Antony .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (06) :2185-2188
[3]   Gently Does It: Ramping Is the Key to Safe and Efficient Lithotripsy [J].
Bultitude, Matthew ;
Thomas, Kay .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (02) :274-275
[4]   1ST CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE WITH EXTRACORPOREALLY INDUCED DESTRUCTION OF KIDNEY-STONES BY SHOCK-WAVES [J].
CHAUSSY, C ;
SCHMIEDT, E ;
JOCHAM, D ;
BRENDEL, W ;
FORSSMANN, B ;
WALTHER, V .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1982, 127 (03) :417-420
[5]   The Efficacy and Safety of Tamsulosin Combined with Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [J].
Chen, Kai ;
Mi, Hua ;
Xu, Guangyu ;
Liu, Lin ;
Sun, Xiubin ;
Wang, Shiping ;
Meng, Qingrong ;
Lv, Tao .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2015, 29 (10) :1166-1176
[6]   Tamsulosin treatment increases clinical success rate of single extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones [J].
Gravina, GL ;
Costa, AM ;
Ronchi, P ;
Galatioto, GP ;
Angelucci, A ;
Castellani, D ;
Narcisi, F ;
Vicentini, C .
UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (01) :24-28
[7]   Comparing the Efficacy of Tamsulosin and Silodosin in the Medical Expulsion Therapy for Ureteral Calculi [J].
Gupta, Sandeep ;
Lodi, Bijit ;
Singh, Akoijam Kaku ;
Somarendra, Khumukcham ;
Meitei, Kangjam Sholay ;
Singh, Sinam Rajendra .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2013, 7 (08) :1672-1674
[8]   Efficacy and safety of silodosin in the medical expulsion therapy for distal ureteral calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Huang, Wei ;
Xue, Peng ;
Zong, Huantao ;
Zhang, Yong .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 81 (01) :13-22
[9]   Administration of the selective alpha 1A-adrenoceptor antagonist silodosin facilitates expulsion of size 5-10 mm distal ureteral stones, as compared to control [J].
Itoh, Yasunori ;
Okada, Atsushi ;
Yasui, Takahiro ;
Ando, Ryousuke ;
Tozawa, Keiichi ;
Sasaki, Shoichi ;
Kohri, Kenjiro .
INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2013, 45 (03) :675-678
[10]   Contemporary Management of Medium-Sized (10-20mm) Renal Stones: A Retrospective Multicenter Observational Study [J].
Kiremit, Murat Can ;
Guven, Selcuk ;
Sarica, Kemal ;
Ozturk, Ahmet ;
Buldu, Ibrahim ;
Kafkasli, Alper ;
Balasar, Mehmet ;
Istanbulluoglu, Okan ;
Horuz, Rahim ;
Cetinel, Cihangir Ali ;
Kandemir, Abdulkadir ;
Albayrak, Selami .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2015, 29 (07) :838-843