Ground reaction forces and EMG activity with ankle bracing during inversion stress

被引:31
|
作者
Cordova, ML [1 ]
Armstrong, CW
Rankin, JM
Yeasting, RA
机构
[1] Indiana State Univ, Athlet Training Dept, Terre Haute, IN 47809 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Dept Hlth Promot & Human Performance, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[3] Med Coll Ohio, Dept Anat & Neurobiol, Toledo, OH 43699 USA
关键词
ankle prophylaxes; joint forces; electromyography; dynamic inversion loading;
D O I
10.1097/00005768-199809000-00004
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of external ankle support on ground reaction forces and myoelectrical activity of selected lower extremity muscles during dynamic inversion stress. Methods: Twenty-four healthy males performed five trials of a lateral dynamic movement at a rate between 80-90% of their maximal speed under three ankle brace conditions (no brace-control, Aircast Sport-Stirrup, Active Ankle). Ground reaction forces along the mediolateral axis and EMG activity of the peroneus longus, tibialis anterior, and medial gastrocnemius were simultaneously recorded during force plate contact. Results: Ankle bracing did not affect peak impact force (P > 0.05), maximum loading force (P > 0.05), or peak propulsion force (P > 0.05) in the lateral direction compared with the control condition. Ankle bracing reduced the EMG activity of the peroneus longus during peak impact force compared with the control condition (P < 0.05), although no differences were noted between the two braces. Furthermore, peroneous longus activity during maximum loading force and peak propulsion remained unaffected (P < 0.05). Ankle bracing did not affect the EMG activity of the tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius at the point of peak impact force, maximum loading force (P > 0.05), and peak propulsion force (P > 0.05). Conclusions: These data suggest that ankle bracing may not affect the forces experienced at the foot and ankle, bur helps reduce the strain placed on the peroneus longus during peak impact force. Furthermore, ankle bracing does not alter the function of the tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius during dynamic inversion stress.
引用
收藏
页码:1363 / 1370
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] Machine Learning-Based Diabetic Neuropathy and Previous Foot Ulceration Patients Detection Using Electromyography and Ground Reaction Forces during Gait
    Haque, Fahmida
    Reaz, Mamun Bin Ibne
    Chowdhury, Muhammad Enamul Hoque
    Ezeddin, Maymouna
    Kiranyaz, Serkan
    Alhatou, Mohammed
    Ali, Sawal Hamid Md
    Bakar, Ahmad Ashrif A.
    Srivastava, Geetika
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (09)
  • [22] Agonist versus antagonist muscle fatigue effects on thigh muscle activity and vertical ground reaction during drop landing
    Kellis, Eleftherios
    Kouveliod, Vasiliki
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (01) : 55 - 64
  • [23] Effect of double- density foot orthoses on ground reaction forces and lower limb muscle activities during running in adults with and without pronated feet
    Ebrahim Piri
    Vahid Sobhani
    AmirAli Jafarnezhadgero
    Ehsan Arabzadeh
    Alireza Shamsoddini
    Matteo Zago
    Urs Granacher
    BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 17 (1)
  • [24] Knee abduction moment is predicted by lower gluteus medius force and larger vertical and lateral ground reaction forces during drop vertical jump in female athletes
    Ueno, Ryo
    Navacchia, Alessandro
    DiCesare, Christopher A.
    Ford, Kevin R.
    Myer, Gregory D.
    Ishida, Tomoya
    Tohyama, Harukazu
    Hewett, Timothy E.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2020, 103
  • [25] Comparison of Peak Ground Reaction Force, Joint Kinetics and Kinematics, and Muscle Activity Between a Flexible and Steel Barbell During the Back Squat Exercise
    Hutchison, Randolph E.
    Caterisano, Anthony
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN KINETICS, 2019, 68 (01) : 99 - 108