MODELING THE MULTI-BAND AFTERGLOW OF GRB 130831A: EVIDENCE FOR A SPINNING-DOWN MAGNETAR DOMINATED BY GRAVITATIONAL WAVE LOSSES?

被引:9
作者
Zhang, Q. [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Y. F. [3 ,4 ]
Zong, H. S. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Phys, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Joint Ctr Particle Nucl Phys & Cosmol, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ, Sch Astron & Space Sci, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Modern Astron & Astrophys, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Theoret Phys, State Key Lab Theoret Phys, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
gamma-ray burst: individual (GRB 130831A); gravitational waves; ISM: jets and outflows; stars: neutron; GAMMA-RAY BURSTS; NEWLY BORN MAGNETARS; ENERGY INJECTION; LIGHT CURVES; EXTENDED EMISSION; CENTRAL ENGINE; NEUTRON-STARS; SWIFT; PROMPT; INSTABILITY;
D O I
10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/156
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The X-ray afterglow of GRB 130831A shows an "internal plateau" with a decay slope of similar to 0.8, followed by a steep drop at around 10(5) s with a slope of similar to 6. After the drop, the X-ray afterglow continues with a much shallower decay. The optical afterglow exhibits two segments of plateaus separated by a luminous optical flare, followed by a normal decay with a slope basically consistent with that of the late-time X-ray afterglow. The decay of the internal X-ray plateau is much steeper than what we expect in the simplest magnetar model. We propose a scenario in which the magnetar undergoes gravitational-wave-driven r-mode instability, and the spin-down is dominated by gravitational wave losses up to the end of the steep plateau, so that such a relatively steep plateau can be interpreted as the internal emission of the magnetar wind and the sharp drop can be produced when the magnetar collapses into a black hole. This scenario also predicts an initial X-ray plateau lasting for hundreds of seconds with an approximately constant flux which is compatible with observation. Assuming that the magnetar wind has a negligible contribution in the optical band, we interpret the optical afterglow as the forward shock emission by invoking the energy injection from a continuously refreshed shock following the prompt emission phase. It is shown that our model can basically describe the temporal evolution of the multi-band afterglow of GRB 130831A.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   A new class of unstable modes of rotating relativistic stars [J].
Andersson, N .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 502 (02) :708-713
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, REV MOD ASTRON
[3]   BATSE OBSERVATIONS OF GAMMA-RAY BURST SPECTRA .1. SPECTRAL DIVERSITY [J].
BAND, D ;
MATTESON, J ;
FORD, L ;
SCHAEFER, B ;
PALMER, D ;
TEEGARDEN, B ;
CLINE, T ;
BRIGGS, M ;
PACIESAS, W ;
PENDLETON, G ;
FISHMAN, G ;
KOUVELIOTOU, C ;
MEEGAN, C ;
WILSON, R ;
LESTRADE, P .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 413 (01) :281-292
[4]   The burst alert telescope (BAT) on the Swift MIDEX mission [J].
Barthelmy, SD ;
Barbier, LM ;
Cummings, JR ;
Fenimore, EE ;
Gehrels, N ;
Hullinger, D ;
Krimm, HA ;
Markwardt, CB ;
Palmer, DM ;
Parsons, A ;
Sato, G ;
Suzuki, M ;
Takahashi, T ;
Tashiro, M ;
Tueller, J .
SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2005, 120 (3-4) :143-164
[5]   Short gamma-ray bursts with extended emission from magnetar birth: jet formation and collimation [J].
Bucciantini, N. ;
Metzger, B. D. ;
Thompson, T. A. ;
Quataert, E. .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 419 (02) :1537-1545
[6]   The Swift X-ray telescope [J].
Burrows, DN ;
Hill, JE ;
Nousek, JA ;
Kennea, JA ;
Wells, A ;
Osborne, JP ;
Abbey, AF ;
Beardmore, A ;
Mukerjee, K ;
Short, ADT ;
Chincarini, G ;
Campana, S ;
Citterio, O ;
Moretti, A ;
Pagani, C ;
Tagliaferri, G ;
Giommi, P ;
Capalbi, M ;
Tamburelli, F ;
Angelini, L ;
Cusumano, G ;
Bräuninger, HW ;
Burkert, W ;
Hartner, GD .
SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2005, 120 (3-4) :165-195
[7]  
Butler N., 2012, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V8446, P10
[8]   A trio of gamma-ray burst supernovae: GRB 120729A, GRB 130215A/SN 2013ez, and GRB 130831A/SN 2013fu [J].
Cano, Z. ;
de Ugarte Postigo, A. ;
Pozanenko, A. ;
Butler, N. ;
Thoene, C. C. ;
Guidorzi, C. ;
Kruehler, T. ;
Gorosabel, J. ;
Jakobsson, P. ;
Leloudas, G. ;
Malesani, D. ;
Hjorth, J. ;
Melandri, A. ;
Mundell, C. ;
Wiersema, K. ;
D'Avanzo, P. ;
Schulze, S. ;
Gomboc, A. ;
Johansson, A. ;
Zheng, W. ;
Kann, D. A. ;
Knust, F. ;
Varela, K. ;
Akerlof, C. W. ;
Bloom, J. ;
Burkhonov, V. ;
Cooke, E. ;
de Diego, J. A. ;
Dhungana, G. ;
Farina, C. ;
Ferrante, F. V. ;
Flewelling, H. A. ;
Fox, O. D. ;
Fynbo, J. ;
Gehrels, N. ;
Georgiev, L. ;
Gonzalez, J. J. ;
Greiner, J. ;
Guever, T. ;
Hatch, N. ;
Jelinek, M. ;
Kehoe, R. ;
Klose, S. ;
Klunko, E. ;
Kopae, D. ;
Kutyrev, A. ;
Krugly, Y. ;
Lee, W. H. ;
Levan, A. ;
Linkov, V. .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2014, 568
[9]   SOLUTIONS OF 2 PROBLEMS IN THEORY OF GRAVITATIONAL RADIATION [J].
CHANDRASEKHAR, S .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1970, 24 (11) :611-+
[10]   Wind interaction models for gamma-ray burst afterglows: The case for two types of progenitors [J].
Chevalier, RA ;
Li, ZY .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 536 (01) :195-212