GeoDart: A System for Discovering Maps Discrepancies

被引:5
作者
Bandil, Ayush [1 ]
Girdhar, Vaishali [1 ]
Chau, Hieu [1 ]
Ali, Mohamed [1 ]
Hendawi, Abdeltawab [2 ]
Govind, Harsh [3 ]
Cao, Peiwei [3 ]
Song, Ashley [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Tacoma, WA 98402 USA
[2] Univ Rhode Isl, Kingston, RI 02881 USA
[3] Microsoft Corp, Washington, DC USA
来源
2021 IEEE 37TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA ENGINEERING (ICDE 2021) | 2021年
关键词
D O I
10.1109/ICDE51399.2021.00285
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Map service providers are working hard to maintain high-quality maps service to more than three billion digital maps users. As each provider presents its unique routing engine and road network graph (RNG) mapping techniques, inconsistencies in services provided are inevitable. These inconsistencies may be of two types- (1) inconsistencies in RNG, including missing or shifted road segments, missing turn restriction, or mislabeled road attributes; or (2) inconsistencies in routing service arising from the unique routing algorithm (RA). Discovering those inconsistencies would improve the routing services efficiency. This paper presents a system, named GeoDart, that compares publicly available routing data from the APIs of Bing Maps, Google Maps, and OpenStreetMaps (OSM) to automatically discover discrepancies. The system categorizes the detected discrepancies based on (1) routing data such as distance, duration, and route geometry, (2) the attributes of the road segments, and (3) the connectivity and turn restrictions of the RNG. Equipped with an ensemble of Multi-Layer Perception (MLP) and Support Vector Machine Classifiers (SVC), GeoDart can efficiently discover and classify maps discrepancies. Through its graphical interface, the GeoDart system enables users such as professional editors and cartographers to visually inspect, identify, and correct map discrepancies mutually across the three engines.
引用
收藏
页码:2535 / 2546
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, P IEEE C COMP VIS PA
  • [2] Bandil Ayush, 2020, SIGSPATIAL '20: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, P425, DOI 10.1145/3397536.3422348
  • [3] Towards an Automated Comparison of OpenStreetMap with Authoritative Road Datasets
    Brovelli, Maria Antonia
    Minghini, Marco
    Molinari, Monia
    Mooney, Peter
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS IN GIS, 2017, 21 (02) : 191 - 206
  • [4] Burr Matt., GOOGLE MAPS SUGGESTE
  • [5] A polygon-based approach for matching OpenStreetMap road networks with regional transit authority data
    Fan, Hongchao
    Yang, Bisheng
    Zipf, Alexander
    Rousell, Adam
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2016, 30 (04) : 748 - 764
  • [6] Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography
    Goodchild, Michael
    [J]. GEOJOURNAL, 2007, 69 (04) : 211 - 221
  • [7] Grand View Research, DIG MAP MARK SIZ SHA
  • [8] Assessment of logical consistency in OpenStreetMap based on the spatial similarity concept
    Hashemi, Peyman
    Ali Abbaspour, Rahim
    [J]. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, 2015, 0 (9783319142791): : 19 - 36
  • [9] Helbich Marco., 2012, Comparative Spatial Analysis of Positional Accuracy of OpenStreetMap and Proprietary Geodata, V4, P24, DOI DOI 10.1080/13658816
  • [10] Assessing Completeness and Spatial Error of Features in Volunteered Geographic Information
    Jackson, Steven P.
    Mullen, William
    Agouris, Peggy
    Crooks, Andrew
    Croitoru, Arie
    Stefanidis, Anthony
    [J]. ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2013, 2 (02) : 507 - 530