Anatomical Considerations for Subaxial (C2) Pedicle Screw Placement A Radiographic Study With Computed Tomography in 93 Patients

被引:30
|
作者
Smith, Zachary A. [1 ,2 ]
Bistazzoni, Simona [1 ,2 ]
Onibokun, Adebukoa [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Nan-Fu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sassi, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Khoo, Larry T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Santa Monica Spine Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Neurol Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Kaohsiung Armed Forces Gen Hosp, Div Neurosurg, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
来源
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES | 2010年 / 23卷 / 03期
关键词
axis; C2; pedicle; computed tomography; FIXATION; AXIS; FUSION;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181b40234
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Radiographic study. Objective: More detailed anatomical knowledge of the C2 pedicle is required to optimize and minimize the risk of screw placement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the linear and angular dimensions of the true C2 pedicle using axial computed tomography. Background Data: Although earlier studies have analyzed the anatomy of the C2 pars interarticularis, little attention has been focused on the dimensions of the C2 pedicle. Methods: Ninety-three patients (47 males, 46 females; mean age 48.4 y) who had previous cervical spinal computed tomography imaging were evaluated for this study. Axial images of the C2 pedicle were selected and the following pedicle parameters were determined: pedicle width (the mediolateral diameter of the pedicle isthmus, perpendicular to the pedicle axis) and pedicle transverse angle (PTA, ie, the angle between the pedicle axis and the midline of the vertebral body). Results: The overall mean pedicle width was 5.8 +/- 1.2 mm. The mean pedicle width in male patients (6.0 +/- 1.3 mm) was greater than that in the female patients (5.6 +/- 1.1 mm). This difference was not found to be statistically significant (P = 0.679). The overall mean PTA was 43.9 +/- 3.9 degrees. The mean PTA in male patients was 43.2 +/- 3.8 degrees, whereas that in female patients was 44.7 +/- 3.7 degrees. Conclusions: Given the significant variability in pedicle widths and the need for precise trajectory planning in pedicle cannulation, preoperative planning is absolutely mandatory. A significant percentage of patients have pedicle widths that may not accommodate screw fixation. In addition, the angle of entry into the C2 pedicle must be carefully measured for safe instrumentation at this level.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 179
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Anatomical and Technical Considerations of Robot-Assisted Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement: A Cadaveric Study
    Mao, Jennifer Z.
    Soliman, Mohamed A. R.
    Karamian, Brian A.
    Khan, Asham
    Fritz, Alexander G.
    Avasthi, Naval
    DiMaria, Stephen
    Levy, Bennett R.
    O'Connor, Timothy E.
    Schroeder, Gregory
    Pollina, John
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Mullin, Jeffrey P.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 13 (07) : 1992 - 2000
  • [32] Morphology analysis of the C2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement: comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methods
    Wu, YueLin
    Liang, ZhaoQuan
    Bao, JunHao
    Wen, Ling
    Zhang, Li
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [33] The anatomic suitability of the C2 vertebra for intralaminar and pedicular fixation: a computed tomography study
    Bhatnagar, Rishi
    Yu, Warren D.
    Bergin, Patrick F.
    Matteini, Lauren E.
    O'Brien, Joseph R.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 10 (10) : 896 - 899
  • [34] Anatomical analysis of the C2 pedicle in patients with basilar invagination
    Ruipei Xiao
    Juedong Hou
    Yang Zhou
    Jintao Zheng
    Xiaobao Zou
    Yongjian Zhu
    Ling Yao
    Xiangyang Ma
    Jianting Chen
    Jincheng Yang
    European Spine Journal, 2022, 31 : 2684 - 2692
  • [35] TOMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS FOR C2 SCREW PLACEMENT IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS
    Astolfi, Rodrigo Schroll
    Tachibana, Wilson Tadao
    Letaif, Olavo Biraghi
    Cristante, Alexandre Fogaca
    Oliveira, Reginaldo Perilo
    Pessoa de Barros Filho, Tarcisio Eloy
    ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2012, 20 (04): : 207 - 209
  • [36] Evaluation of C2 pedicle screw placement via the freehand technique by neurosurgical trainees
    Pham, Martin H.
    Bakhsheshian, Joshua
    Reid, Patrick C.
    Buchanan, Ian A.
    Fredrickson, Vance L.
    Liu, John C.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2018, 29 (03) : 235 - 240
  • [37] Ideal entry point and trajectory for C2 pedicle screw placement in basilar invagination patients with high-riding vertebral artery based on 3D computed tomography
    Zhou, Lu-Ping
    Zhang, Ren-Jie
    Jiang, Zhen-Fei
    Tao, Er-Xu
    Shang, Jin
    Shen, Cai-Liang
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (08) : 1281 - 1291
  • [38] Radiographic and clinical assessment on the accuracy and complications of C1 anterior lateral mass and C2 anterior pedicle screw placement in the TARP-III procedure: a study of 106 patients
    Xueshi Li
    Fuzhi Ai
    Hong Xia
    Zenghui Wu
    Xiangyang Ma
    Qingshui Yin
    European Spine Journal, 2014, 23 : 1712 - 1719
  • [39] Establishing Safe Surgical Parameters for Placement of C2 Pedicle Screws: A Retrospective Study
    Tunc, Bekir
    Divanlioglu, Denizhan
    Gunerhan, Goksal
    Isitan, Egemen
    Cagil, Emin
    Dalgic, Ali
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2024,
  • [40] Feasibility of C2 Pedicle Screw Fixation With the "in-out-in" Technique for Patients With Basilar Invagination
    Xu, Panjie
    Lin, Junyu
    Xiao, Hang
    Zheng, Jianying
    Ji, Wei
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (11) : 798 - 804