Episiotomy - Risk or protective factor for severe perineal trauma during vaginal delivery?

被引:3
作者
David, M
Pachaly, J
Vetter, K
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Klin Frauenheilkunde & Geburtshilfe, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[2] Vivantes Klinikum Neukoln, Klin Geburtsmed, Berlin, Germany
关键词
episiotomy; severe perineal laceration; risk factors; operative vaginal delivery;
D O I
10.1055/s-2005-865700
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose: Is an episiotomy a protective or a risk factor for severe perineal lacerations; which other obstetric influencing factors exist? Patients and Methods: Retrospective analysis of the perinatal data from Berlin from 1993 to 1999. Study inclusion criteria: vaginal delivery in singleton pregnancies. Setting up of two study subgroups: vaginal delivery of singletons, cephalic presentation > 34/0 gestational weeks, birth weight 2500 to 4000 g. Separate analysis of the primi- (subgroup 1) and multiparae (subgroup 2). Multivariate analysis with stepwise logistic regression. Identification of factors which correlate with severe perineal lacerations. Results: 74.7% of all vaginal deliveries of singletons (n = 128745) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In spontaneous deliveries, the frequency of episiotomy was 60.8%, in vacuum extraction and forceps delivery 95.3 and 98.6% respectively. Severe perineal lacerations were significantly more frequent in vaginal-operative deliveries than in spontaneous vaginal delivery. If no episiotomy was incised, perineal lacerations stage 3/4 were less frequent in spontaneous and vacuum extraction deliveries. Following regression analysis, severe perineal lacerations were less frequent in primipara if the active period of labour is < 10 minutes, if no episiotomy is incised, in vacuum than in forceps extraction, if fetal head circumference is < 36 cm, and if no further traumas of the birth canal occur. Results were similar for multiparae: severe perineal lacerations were less frequent if the active period of labour is! 10 minutes, if no episiotomy is incised, and if no vaginal operative delivery occurs. Conclusions: Episiotomies seem to carry one of the highest risks for a severe perineal laceration among the avoidable risk factors. Therefore, use of an episiotomy must be restricted to well-justified cases. When considering perineal protection, vacuum extraction should be preferred to forceps extraction.
引用
收藏
页码:604 / 611
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   In women with spontaneous vaginal delivery, repair of perineal tears might be easier compared to episiotomy [J].
Sagi-Dain, Lena ;
Kreinin-Bleicher, Inna ;
Shkolnik, Chen ;
Bahous, Rabia ;
Sagi, Shlomi .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 32 (07) :1727-1732
[22]   Letter to the editor: selective episiotomy versus no episiotomy for severe perineal trauma: a systematic review with meta-analysis [J].
Maurizio Serati ;
Stefano Salvatore ;
Andrea Braga .
International Urogynecology Journal, 2020, 31 :1715-1716
[23]   Letter to the editor: selective episiotomy versus no episiotomy for severe perineal trauma: a systematic review with meta-analysis [J].
Serati, Maurizio ;
Salvatore, Stefano ;
Braga, Andrea .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 31 (08) :1715-1716
[24]   The role of mediolateral episiotomy during operative vaginal delivery [J].
Sultan, A. H. ;
Thakar, R. ;
Ismail, K. M. ;
Kalis, V ;
Laine, K. ;
Raisanen, S. H. ;
de Leeuw, J. W. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 240 :192-196
[25]   In women with spontaneous vaginal delivery, repair of perineal tears might be easier compared to episiotomy [J].
Lena Sagi-Dain ;
Inna Kreinin-Bleicher ;
Chen Shkolnik ;
Rabia Bahous ;
Shlomi Sagi .
International Urogynecology Journal, 2021, 32 :1727-1732
[26]   Risk factors for severe perineal trauma during childbirth: An updated meta-analysis [J].
Pergialiotis, Vasilios ;
Bellos, Ioannis ;
Fanaki, Maria ;
Vrachnis, Nikolaos ;
Doumouchtsis, Stergios K. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 247 :94-100
[27]   Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery [J].
de Leeuw, J. W. ;
de Wit, C. ;
Kuijken, J. P. J. A. ;
Bruinse, H. W. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (01) :104-108
[28]   Perineal lacerations during spontaneous vaginal delivery [J].
Bodner, K ;
Bodner-Adler, B ;
Wagenbichler, P ;
Kaider, A ;
Leodolter, S ;
Husslein, P ;
Mayerhofer, K .
WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2001, 113 (19) :743-746
[29]   Incidence and risk factors for severe perineal laceration after vaginal delivery in Japanese patients [J].
Nakai A. ;
Yoshida A. ;
Yamaguchi S. ;
Kawabata I. ;
Hayashi M. ;
Yokota A. ;
Isozaki T. ;
Takeshita T. .
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2006, 274 (4) :222-226
[30]   Determinants of the length of episiotomy or spontaneous posterior perineal lacerations during vaginal birth [J].
Diaa E. E. Rizk ;
Mary N. Abadir ;
Letha B. Thomas ;
Fikri Abu-Zidan .
International Urogynecology Journal, 2005, 16 :395-400