Field evaluation of a semi-automatic vegetable transplanter for major vegetable crops

被引:0
|
作者
Bhambota, S. [1 ]
Dixit, A. K. [1 ]
Manes, G. S. [1 ]
Dhatt, A. S. [2 ]
Singh, S. K. [1 ]
Singh, Arshdeep [1 ]
机构
[1] Punjab Agr Univ, Dept Farm Machinery & Power Engn, Ludhiana 141004, Punjab, India
[2] Punjab Agr Univ, Dept Vegetable Sci, Vegetable Sci, Ludhiana 141004, Punjab, India
来源
INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES | 2018年 / 88卷 / 11期
关键词
Brinjal; Chili; Tomato; Transplanting; Vegetable transplanter;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
A tractor operated semi-automatic two row vegetable transplanter using plug type nursery was developed. This machine makes ridges with provisions to vary row and plant spacing. Machine released the seedlings close to the ground in near vertical position without any damage. Machine was evaluated in the field for transplanting tomato, brinjal, and chilli nursery at forward speeds of 1.00, 1.25, and 1.50 km/h. Plug type nursery was used which was grown in trays having truncated pyramid shape cells of volume 16.28 cm(3) using soil-less media developed by Punjab Agricultural University. Plant missing, plant doubling, and quality of feed index was adversely affected at higher forward speeds for tomato and brinjal. Quality of feed index was 100 % for chilli up to highest forward speed of 1.5 km/h. The machine can transplant tomato, brinjal and chilli at forward speed of 1.00 km/h, 1.25 km/h, and 1.50 km/h respectively with plant missing of less than 4% at these recommended speeds. The machine could transplant the seedlings with inclinations less than 30 degrees , which is considered erect. No plant mortality was observed after 20 days for all the crops studied. Field capacity of the machine for transplanting tomato, brinjal and chilli was 0.103 ha/h, 0.126 ha/h, and 0.152 ha/h, respectively as recommended for these cops. Saving in labour with the use of the machine over manual method for transplanting tomato, brinjal and chilli was 84.86%, 85.58%, and 88.41%, respectively, whereas saving in cost was 24.80%, 28.03% and 42.42%, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 111
页数:5
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据