Comparison of intelligent fuzzy based AGC coordinated PID controlled and PSS controlled AVR system

被引:43
作者
Mukherjee, V. [1 ]
Ghoshal, S. P.
机构
[1] Asansol Engn Coll, Dept Elect Engn, Asansol, W Bengal, India
[2] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Durgapur, W Bengal, India
关键词
AGC; AVR; CRPSO; electromechanical local mode of oscillations; PID; PSS; TSFL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijepes.2007.05.002
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This paper attempts to investigate the performance of intelligent fuzzy based coordinated control of the Automatic Generation Control (AGC) loop and the excitation loop equipped with Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controlled Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR) system and Power System Stabilizer (PSS) controlled AVR system. The work establishes that PSS controlled AVR system is much more robust in dynamic performance of the system over a wide range of system operating configurations. Thus, it is revealed that PSS equipped AVR is much more superior than PID equipped AVR in damping the oscillation resulting in improved transient response. The paper utilizes a novel class of Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) termed as Craziness based Particle Swarm Optimization (CRPSO) as optimizing tool to get optimal tuning of PSS parameters as well as the gains of PID controllers. For on-line, off-nominal operating conditions Takagi Sugeno Fuzzy Logic (TSFL) has been applied to obtain the off-nominal optimal gains of PID controllers and parameters of PSS. Implementation of TSFL helps to achieve very fast dynamic response. Fourth order model of generator with AVR and high gain thyristor excitation system is considered for PSS controlled system while normal gain exciter is considered for PID controlled system. Simulation study also reveals that with high gain exciter, PID control is not at all effective. Transient responses are achieved by using modal analysis. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 689
页数:11
相关论文
共 12 条
[2]   POLE-PLACEMENT DESIGNS OF POWER-SYSTEM STABILIZERS [J].
CHOW, JH ;
SANCHEZGASCA, JJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1989, 4 (01) :271-277
[3]  
Eberhart RC, 2001, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT, P81, DOI 10.1109/CEC.2001.934374
[4]   Optimal pole shifting for power system stabilization [J].
El-Sherbiny, MK ;
Hasan, MM ;
El-Saady, G ;
Yousef, AM .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2003, 66 (03) :253-258
[5]   Optimizations of PID gains by particle swarm optimizations in fuzzy based automatic generation control [J].
Ghoshal, SP .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2004, 72 (03) :203-212
[6]   Application of GA/GA-SA based fuzzy automatic generation control of a multi-area thermal generating system [J].
Ghoshal, SP .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2004, 70 (02) :115-127
[7]   A particle swarm optimization-based method for multiobjective design optimizations [J].
Ho, SL ;
Yang, SY ;
Ni, GZ ;
Lo, EWC ;
Wong, HC .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2005, 41 (05) :1756-1759
[8]   TUNING OF POWER-SYSTEM STABILIZERS USING AN ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK [J].
HSU, YY ;
CHEN, CR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION, 1991, 6 (04) :612-619
[9]  
Kennedy J, 1995, 1995 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-6, P1942, DOI 10.1109/icnn.1995.488968
[10]  
Kundur P., 1994, POWER SYSTEM STABILI, V7