Toxic industrial chemical (TIC) source emissions modeling for pressurized liquefied gases

被引:28
作者
Britter, Rex [2 ]
Weil, Jeffrey [3 ]
Leung, Joseph [4 ]
Hanna, Steven [1 ]
机构
[1] Hanna Consultants, Kennebunkport, ME 04046 USA
[2] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[4] Leung Inc, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA USA
关键词
Chlorine releases to atmosphere; Hazardous chemicals; Pressurized liquefied gas releases; Source emission models; Toxic industrial chemicals; Two-phase jets; FLASHING LIQUID JETS; GENERALIZED CORRELATION; DISPERSION MODELS; FLOW DISCHARGE; DROPLET SIZE; 2-PHASE; NOZZLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.021
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The objective of this article is to report current toxic industrial chemical (TIC) source emissions formulas appropriate for use in atmospheric comprehensive risk assessment models so as to represent state-of-the-art knowledge. The focus is on high-priority scenarios, including two-phase releases of pressurized liquefied gases such as chlorine from rail cars. The total mass released and the release duration are major parameters, as well as the velocity, thermodynamic state, and amount and droplet sizes of imbedded aerosols of the material at the exit of the rupture, which are required as inputs to the subsequent jet and dispersion modeling. Because of the many possible release scenarios that could develop, a suite of model equations has been described. These allow for gas, two-phase or liquid storage and release through ruptures of various types including sharp-edged and "pipe-like" ruptures. Model equations for jet depressurization and phase change due to flashing are available. Consideration of the importance of vessel response to a rupture is introduced. The breakup of the jet into fine droplets and their subsequent suspension and evaporation, or rainout is still a significant uncertainty in the overall modeling process. The recommended models are evaluated with data from various TIC field experiments, in particular recent experiments with pressurized liquefied gases. It is found that there is typically a factor of two error in models compared with research-grade observations of mass flow rates. However, biases are present in models' estimates of the droplet size distributions resulting from flashing releases. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 25
页数:25
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   A new Lagrangian particle model for the simulation of dense gas dispersion [J].
Anfossi, D. ;
Tinarelli, G. ;
Castelli, S. Trini ;
Nibart, M. ;
Olry, C. ;
Commanay, J. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 44 (06) :753-762
[2]  
Batchelor GK, 1967, An introduction to fluid dynamics
[3]   Rain-out investigation:: Initial droplet size measurement [J].
Bigot, JP ;
Touil, A ;
Bonnet, P ;
Lacôme, JM .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2005, 18 (4-6) :433-442
[4]  
Bragg S.L., 1960, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, V2, P35, DOI [DOI 10.1243/JMES_, 10.1243/JMES_JOUR_1960_002_007_02]
[5]  
Britter R.E., 2009, P09804 DTRA
[6]  
Brodkey R.S., 1969, The phenomena of fluid in motion
[7]   SPRAYS FORMED BY FLASHING LIQUID JETS [J].
BROWN, R ;
YORK, JL .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1962, 8 (02) :149-153
[8]  
CCPS/AIChE, 1999, RELEASE MOD DAT PRED
[9]  
Chisholm D., 1983, Two-phase flow in pipelines and heat exchangers
[10]   Flashing liquid jets and two-phase droplet dispersion I. Experiments for derivation of droplet atomisation correlations [J].
Cleary, Vincent ;
Bowen, Phil ;
Witlox, Henk .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2007, 142 (03) :786-796