Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience

被引:24
作者
Clavel, Nathalie [1 ]
Paquette, Jesseca [2 ]
Dumez, Vincent [3 ]
Del Grande, Claudio [2 ,4 ]
Ghadiri, Djahanchah Philip [5 ]
Pomey, Marie-Pascale [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Normandin, Louise [2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Ingram Sch Nursing, Montreal, PQ H3A 2M7, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Hosp Ctr, Hlth Innovat & Evaluat Hub, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Ctr Excellence Partnership Patients & Publ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Management Evaluat & Policy, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] HEC MONTREAL, Dept Management, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
clinical care; healthcare professionals; patient engagement; patients; scoping review; validated tools; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; SELF-MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATION; FRAMEWORK; EVOLUTION; OUTCOMES; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1111/hex.13344
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Patient engagement in care is a priority and a key component of clinical practice. Different approaches to care have been introduced to foster patient engagement. There is a lack of a recent review on tools for assessing the main concepts and dimensions related to patient engagement in care. Objective Our scoping review sought to map and summarize recently validated tools for assessing various concepts and dimensions of patient engagement in care. Search Strategy A scoping review of recent peer-reviewed articles describing tools that assess preferences in and experience with patient engagement in care was conducted in four databases (Ovid Medline, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL-EBSCO). We adopted a broad definition based on the main concepts of patient engagement in care: patient-centredness, empowerment, shared decision-making and partnership in care. Main Results Of 2161 articles found, 16, each describing a different tool, were included and analysed. Shared decision-making and patient-centredness are the two main concepts evaluated, often simultaneously in most of the tools. Only four scales measure patient-centredness, empowerment and shared decision-making at the same time, but no tool measures the core dimensions of partnership in care. Most of the tools did not include patients in their development or validation or just consulted them during the validation phase. Discussion and Conclusion There is no tool coconstructed with patients from development to validation, which can be used to assess the main concepts and dimensions of patient engagement in care at the same time. Patient and Public Contribution This manuscript was prepared with a patient expert who is one of the authors. Vincent Dumez, who is a patient expert and codirector of the Center of Excellence on Partnership with Patients and the Public, has contributed to the preparation of the manuscript.
引用
收藏
页码:1924 / 1935
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Scoping review of patient-centered care approaches in healthcare [J].
Constand, Marissa K. ;
MacDermid, Joy C. ;
Dal Bello-Haas, Vanina ;
Law, Mary .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
[22]   Scoping review of patient-centered care approaches in healthcare [J].
Marissa K Constand ;
Joy C MacDermid ;
Vanina Dal Bello-Haas ;
Mary Law .
BMC Health Services Research, 14
[23]   Foot health educational interventions for patients and healthcare professionals: A scoping review [J].
Stolt, Minna ;
Gattinger, Heidrun ;
Bostrom, Carina ;
Suhonen, Riitta .
HEALTH EDUCATION JOURNAL, 2020, 79 (04) :390-416
[24]   Experiences of healthcare professionals providing palliative care in home settings - a scoping review [J].
Tan, Luke ;
Sheri, Sonia ;
Goh, Yun Yao ;
Fong, Raeanne ;
Govindasamy, Ranitha ;
Ong, Yun Ting ;
Hamid, Nur Amira Binte Abdul ;
Low, Tessa Li Xiang ;
Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha .
BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2025, 24 (01)
[25]   ‘Practical’ resources to support patient and family engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review [J].
Katharina Kovacs Burns ;
Mandy Bellows ;
Carol Eigenseher ;
Jennifer Gallivan .
BMC Health Services Research, 14
[26]   'Practical' resources to support patient and family engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review [J].
Burns, Katharina Kovacs ;
Bellows, Mandy ;
Eigenseher, Carol ;
Gallivan, Jennifer .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
[27]   Virtual Patient and Family Engagement Strategies in Critical Care: A Scoping Review [J].
Solomon, Joshua ;
Gabbay, Daniel ;
Goldfarb, Michael .
TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2024, 30 (08) :e2203-e2213
[28]   Systematic review of psychometric properties of instruments measuring patient preferences for engagement in health care [J].
Jerofke-Owen, Teresa ;
Garnier-Villarreal, Mauricio ;
Fial, Alissa ;
Tobiano, Georgia .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2020, 76 (08) :1988-2004
[29]   Experiences of healthcare professionals, patients and families with video calls to stimulate patient- and family-centred care during hospitalization: A scoping review [J].
Musters, Selma C. ;
Coolen, Celeste M. ;
Jongerden, Irene P. ;
Schijven, Marlies P. ;
Maaskant, Jolanda M. ;
Eskes, Anne M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024, 33 (09) :3429-3467
[30]   Engagement of Families in the Care of Hospitalized Pediatric Patients: A Scoping Review [J].
Jerofke-Owen, Teresa A. ;
McAndrew, Natalie S. ;
Gralton, Karen S. ;
Totka, Joan P. ;
Weiss, Marianne E. ;
Fial, Alissa V. ;
Sawin, Kathleen J. .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY NURSING, 2022, 28 (02) :151-171