Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience

被引:24
|
作者
Clavel, Nathalie [1 ]
Paquette, Jesseca [2 ]
Dumez, Vincent [3 ]
Del Grande, Claudio [2 ,4 ]
Ghadiri, Djahanchah Philip [5 ]
Pomey, Marie-Pascale [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Normandin, Louise [2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Ingram Sch Nursing, Montreal, PQ H3A 2M7, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Hosp Ctr, Hlth Innovat & Evaluat Hub, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Ctr Excellence Partnership Patients & Publ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Management Evaluat & Policy, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] HEC MONTREAL, Dept Management, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
clinical care; healthcare professionals; patient engagement; patients; scoping review; validated tools; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; SELF-MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATION; FRAMEWORK; EVOLUTION; OUTCOMES; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1111/hex.13344
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Patient engagement in care is a priority and a key component of clinical practice. Different approaches to care have been introduced to foster patient engagement. There is a lack of a recent review on tools for assessing the main concepts and dimensions related to patient engagement in care. Objective Our scoping review sought to map and summarize recently validated tools for assessing various concepts and dimensions of patient engagement in care. Search Strategy A scoping review of recent peer-reviewed articles describing tools that assess preferences in and experience with patient engagement in care was conducted in four databases (Ovid Medline, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL-EBSCO). We adopted a broad definition based on the main concepts of patient engagement in care: patient-centredness, empowerment, shared decision-making and partnership in care. Main Results Of 2161 articles found, 16, each describing a different tool, were included and analysed. Shared decision-making and patient-centredness are the two main concepts evaluated, often simultaneously in most of the tools. Only four scales measure patient-centredness, empowerment and shared decision-making at the same time, but no tool measures the core dimensions of partnership in care. Most of the tools did not include patients in their development or validation or just consulted them during the validation phase. Discussion and Conclusion There is no tool coconstructed with patients from development to validation, which can be used to assess the main concepts and dimensions of patient engagement in care at the same time. Patient and Public Contribution This manuscript was prepared with a patient expert who is one of the authors. Vincent Dumez, who is a patient expert and codirector of the Center of Excellence on Partnership with Patients and the Public, has contributed to the preparation of the manuscript.
引用
收藏
页码:1924 / 1935
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient experiences of engagement with care plans and healthcare professionals' perceptions of that engagement
    Al-Tannir, Mohamad
    AlGahtani, Fahad
    Abu-Shaheen, Amani
    Al-Tannir, Sawsan
    AlFayyad, Isamme
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17
  • [2] Impact of Patient Engagement on Healthcare Quality: A Scoping Review
    Marzban, Sima
    Najafi, Marziye
    Agolli, Arjola
    Ashrafi, Ensieh
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [3] Patient Participation in Mental Health Care - Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals and Patients: A Scoping Review
    Jorgensen, Kim
    Lerbaek, Birgitte
    Frederiksen, Jesper
    Watson, Emma
    Karlsson, Bengt
    ISSUES IN MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2024, 45 (08) : 794 - 810
  • [4] Non-formal patient handover education for healthcare professionals: a scoping review
    Boje, Rikke Buus
    Ludvigsen, Mette Spliid
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2020, 18 (05) : 952 - 985
  • [5] Health literacy continuing education courses and tools for healthcare professionals: a scoping review
    Efthymiou, Areti
    Kalaitzaki, Argyroula
    Kondilis, Barbara
    Rovithis, Michael
    GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION, 2024, 45 (02) : 212 - 247
  • [6] Patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review
    Sagen, Joachim Storen
    Smedslund, Geir
    Simonsen, Ann Elisabeth
    Habberstad, Andreas
    Kjeken, Ingvild
    Dagfinrud, Hanne
    Moe, Rikke Helene
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2023, 12 (02)
  • [7] Promoting patient engagement: a scoping review of actions that align with the interactive care model
    Tobiano, Georgia
    Jerofke-Owen, Teresa
    Marshall, Andrea P.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2021, 35 (03) : 722 - 741
  • [8] Interprofessional education interventions for healthcare professionals to improve patient safety: a scoping review
    Jiang, Yan
    Cai, Yan
    Zhang, Xue
    Wang, Cong
    MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2024, 29 (01):
  • [9] Patients' and healthcare professionals' perceived facilitators and barriers for shared decision-making for frail and elderly patients in perioperative care: a scoping review
    Vogel, Amyn
    Guinemer, Camille
    Fuerstenau, Daniel
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [10] Training healthcare professionals to dignity-in-care: A scoping review
    Buonaccorso, Loredana
    Soncini, Silvia
    Bassi, Maria Chiara
    Mecugni, Daniela
    Ghirotto, Luca
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2025, 146