Eating Disorder Inventory-3, validation in Swedish patients with eating disorders, psychiatric outpatients and a normal control sample

被引:39
作者
Nyman-Carlsson, Erika [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Engstrom, Ingemar [1 ]
Norring, Claes [4 ]
Nevonen, Lauri [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Orebro, Sch Hlth & Med Sci, SE-70182 Orebro, Sweden
[2] Capio Eating Disorder Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Univ Orebro, Psychiat Res Ctr, SE-70182 Orebro, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Neurosci, Ctr Psychiat Res, Stockholm Ctr Eating Disorders,R&D Unit, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Praktikertjanst Psychiat AB, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Eating disorders; Eating Disorder Inventory-3; Validation; RISK-FACTORS;
D O I
10.3109/08039488.2014.949305
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: The Eating Disorder Inventory-3 (EDI-3) is designed to assess eating disorder psychopathology and the associated psychological symptoms. The instrument has been revised and has not yet been validated for Swedish conditions in its current form. Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of this inventory and present national norms for Swedish females. Methods: Data from patients with eating disorders (n = 292), psychiatric outpatients (n = 140) and normal controls (n = 648), all females, were used to study the internal consistency, the discriminative ability, and the sensitivity and specificity of the inventory using preliminary cut-offs for each subscale and diagnosis separately. Swedish norms were compared with those from Denmark, USA, Canada, Europe and Australian samples. Results: The reliability was acceptable for all subscales except Asceticism among normal controls. Analysis of variance showed that the EDI-3 discriminates significantly between eating disorders and normal controls. Anorexia nervosa was significantly discriminated from bulimia nervosa and eating disorder not otherwise specified on the Eating Disorder Risk Scales. Swedish patients scored significantly lower than patients from other countries on the majority of the subscales. Drive for Thinness is the second best predictor for an eating disorder. The best predictor for anorexia nervosa was Interoceptive Deficits and Bulimia for the other diagnoses. Conclusions/clinical implications: The EDI-3 is valid for use with Swedish patients as a clinical assessment tool for the treatment planning and evaluation of patients with eating-related problems. However, it still exist some uncertainty regarding its use as a screening tool.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 151
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Abraham SE, 2006, AUST NZ J PSYCHIAT, V40, P150, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2006.01762.x
[2]   Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves [J].
Akobeng, Anthony K. .
ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2007, 96 (05) :644-647
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, V4th
[4]  
[Anonymous], GRAPHP COM
[5]  
Bennett K, 1997, Health Care Women Int, V18, P495
[6]  
Casiero Deena, 2006, Cardiol Rev, V14, P227
[7]   Validating the Eating Disorder Inventory-3 (EDI-3): A Comparison Between 561 Female Eating Disorders Patients and 878 Females from the General Population [J].
Clausen, Loa ;
Rosenvinge, Jan H. ;
Friborg, Oddgeir ;
Rokkedal, Kristian .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 2011, 33 (01) :101-110
[8]   Validating the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI-2) in Two Danish Samples: A Comparison between Female Eating Disorder Patients and Females from the General Population [J].
Clausen, Loa ;
Rokkedal, Kristian ;
Rosenvinge, Jan H. .
EUROPEAN EATING DISORDERS REVIEW, 2009, 17 (06) :462-467
[9]  
Cohen J, 1988, The effect size index: d. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
[10]   Increased Mortality in Bulimia Nervosa and Other Eating Disorders [J].
Crow, Scott J. ;
Peterson, Carol B. ;
Swanson, Sonja A. ;
Raymond, Nancy C. ;
Specker, Sheila ;
Eckert, Elke D. ;
Mitchell, James E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 166 (12) :1342-1346