The prognostic profile of subfertile couples and treatment outcome after expectant management, intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilisation: a study protocol for the meta-analysis of individual patient data

被引:3
作者
van den Boogaard, N. M. [1 ,2 ]
Hompes, P. G. A. [2 ]
Barnhart, K. [3 ]
Bhattacharya, S. [4 ]
Custers, I. M.
Coutifaris, C. [5 ]
Goverde, A. J. [6 ]
Guzick, D. S. [7 ]
Litvak, P. F. [8 ]
Steures, P. N.
van der Veen, F.
Bossuyt, P. [9 ]
Mol, B. W. J.
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Ctr Reprod Med, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Free Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Aberdeen, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Aberdeen, Scotland
[5] Fertil & Reprod Endocrinol & Obstet & Gynecol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Reprod Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
[7] Univ Florida, Dept Hlth Affairs, Jacksonville, FL USA
[8] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, New York, NY USA
[9] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol Biostat & Bioinformat, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Expectant management; in vitro fertilisation; intrauterine insemination; prognostic models; subfertility; ONGOING PREGNANCY; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; PREDICTION MODELS; TIME; IVF;
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03343.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Please cite this paper as: Boogaard N van den, Hompes P, Barnhart K, Bhattacharya S, Custers I, Coutifaris C, Goverde A, Guzick D, Litvak P, Steures P, Veen F van der, Bossuyt P, Mol B. The prognostic profile of subfertile couples and treatment outcome after expectant management, intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilisation: a study protocol for the meta-analysis of individual patient data. BJOG 2012;119:953957. Objective The current evidence concerning the best treatment option for couples with unexplained and male subfertility is inconclusive. Most studies that have evaluated the effectiveness of treatment options, such as expectant management (EM), intrauterine insemination (IUI), with or without controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), and in vitro fertilisation (IVF), have not taken the couples prognosis into account. It is very likely that the individual prognosis of the couple influences the effect of treatment. Individual patient data analyses allow us to take these prognostic factors into account, and to evaluate their effect on treatment outcome. This study aims to use anonymised data from relevant published trials to perform an individual patient data meta-analysis, evaluating the effect of couples prognosis on the effectiveness of EM, IUI, with or without COS, and IVF. Methods Based on earlier systematic reviews and an updated search, randomised controlled trials will be considered for inclusion. Untreated subfertile couples with unexplained or male subfertility included in trials comparing EM, IUI, with or without COS, and IVF are included. Authors of the included studies will be invited to share their original anonymised data. The data will be assessed on validity, quality and completeness. The prognosis of the individual couple will be calculated with existing prognostic models. The effect of the prognosis on treatment outcome will be analysed with marker-by-treatment predictiveness curves, illustrating the effect of prognosis on treatment outcome. This study is registered in PROSPERO (registration number CRD42011001832). Conclusion Ultimately, this study may help to select the appropriate fertility treatment, tailored to the needs of an individual couple.
引用
收藏
页码:953 / 957
页数:5
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Ovarian stimulation strategies for intrauterine insemination in couples with unexplained infertility: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
    Wessel, J. A.
    Danhof, N. A.
    van Eekelen, R.
    Diamond, M. P.
    Legro, R. S.
    Peeraer, K.
    D'Hooghe, T. M.
    Erdem, M.
    Dankert, T.
    Cohlen, B. J.
    Thyagaraju, C.
    Mol, B. W. J.
    Showell, M.
    van Wely, M.
    Mochtar, M. H.
    Wang, R.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2022, 28 (05) : 733 - 746
  • [2] Methotrexate versus expectant management for treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy: An individual participant data meta-analysis
    Solangon, Sarah Annie
    Van Wely, Madelon
    Van Mello, Norah
    Mol, Ben W.
    Ross, Jackie A.
    Jurkovic, Davor
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2023, 102 (09) : 1159 - 1175
  • [3] Induction of labour versus expectant management at term by subgroups of maternal age: an individual patient data meta-analysis
    Walker, Kate F.
    Malin, Gemma
    Wilson, Philippa
    Thornton, Jim G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 197 : 1 - 5
  • [4] Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty vs. drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a comprehensive, collaborative, individual patient data meta-analysis of 10 randomized clinical (DAEDALUS study)
    Giacoppo, Daniele
    Alfonso, Fernando
    Xu, Bo
    Claessen, Bimmer E. P. M.
    Adriaenssens, Tom
    Jensen, Christoph
    Perez-Vizcayno, Maria J.
    Kang, Yoon
    Degenhardt, Ralf
    Pleva, Leos
    Baan, Jan
    Cuesta, Javier
    Park, Duk-Woo
    Schunkert, Heribert
    Colleran, Roisin
    Kukla, Pavel
    Jimenez-Quevedo, Pilar
    Unverdorben, Martin
    Gao, Runlin
    Naber, Christoph K.
    Park, Seung-Jung
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    Kastrati, Adnan
    Byrne, Robert A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (38) : 3715 - 3728