Neuroanatomical and cognitive mediators of age-related differences in episodic memory

被引:132
作者
Head, Denise [1 ,2 ]
Rodrigue, Karen M. [3 ]
Kennedy, Kristen M. [3 ]
Raz, Naftali [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Psychol, Div Biol & Biomed Sci, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Radiol, Div Biol & Biomed Sci, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[3] Wayne State Univ, Inst Gerontol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Dept Psychol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
关键词
MRI; brain volumetry; brain aging; hippocampus; prefrontal;
D O I
10.1037/0894-4105.22.4.491
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Aging is associated with declines in episodic memory. In this study, the authors used a path analysis framework to explore the mediating role of differences in brain structure, executive functions, and processing speed in age-related differences in episodic memory. Measures of regional brain volume (prefrontal gray and white matter, caudate, hippocampus, visual cortex), executive functions (working memory, inhibitory control, task switching, temporal processing), processing speed, and episodic memory were obtained in a sample of young and older adults. As expected, age was linked to reduction in regional brain volumes and cognitive performance. Moreover, neural and cognitive factors completely mediated age differences in episodic memory. Whereas hippocampal shrinkage directly affected episodic memory, prefrontal volumetric reductions influenced episodic memory via limitations in working memory and inhibitory control. Age-related slowing predicted reduced efficiency in temporal processing, working memory, and inhibitory control. Lastly, poorer temporal processing directly affected episodic memory. No direct effects of age on episodic memory remained once these factors were taken into account. These analyses highlight the value of a multivariate approach with the understanding of complex relationships in cognitive and brain aging.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 507
页数:17
相关论文
共 177 条
[21]   INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCE AND CONTEXTUAL VARIABLES INFLUENCE SPATIAL MEMORY IN YOUNGER AND OLDER ADULTS [J].
CHERRY, KE ;
PARK, DC .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 1993, 8 (04) :517-526
[22]  
Cohen J., 1988, POWERSTATISTICALSCIE, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[23]  
Craik FI M., 1982, Aging and cognitive processes, P191, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4684-4178-9_11, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4684-4178-9_11]
[24]   The executive decline hypothesis of cognitive aging: Do executive deficits qualify as differential deficits and do they mediate age-related memory decline? [J].
Crawford, JR ;
Bryan, J ;
Luszcz, MA ;
Obonsawin, MC ;
Stewart, L .
AGING NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITION, 2000, 7 (01) :9-31
[26]   Associative learning impairments in patients with frontal lobe damage [J].
Dimitrov, M ;
Granetz, J ;
Peterson, M ;
Hollnagel, C ;
Alexander, G ;
Grafman, J .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1999, 41 (02) :213-230
[27]   ADULT AGE-DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY [J].
DOBBS, AR ;
RULE, BG .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 1989, 4 (04) :500-503
[28]   Adult age differences in temporal and item memory [J].
Dumas, JA ;
Hartman, M .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2003, 18 (03) :573-586
[29]   Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands [J].
Duncan, J ;
Owen, AM .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2000, 23 (10) :475-483
[30]   Age differences in inhibition: Possible causes and consequences [J].
Earles, JL ;
Connor, LT ;
Frieske, D ;
Park, DC ;
Smith, AD ;
Zwahr, M .
AGING NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITION, 1997, 4 (01) :45-57