Testing the Masters Hypothesis in commodity futures markets

被引:174
作者
Irwin, Scott H. [2 ]
Sanders, Dwight R. [1 ]
机构
[1] So Illinois Univ, Carbondale, IL 62901 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
Commodity; Futures market; Index funds; Michael Masters; Price; INDEX FUNDS; IMPACT; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2011.10.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The 'Masters Hypothesis' is the claim that long-only index investment was a major driver of the 2007-2008 spike in commodity futures prices and energy futures prices in particular. Index position data compiled by the CFTC are carefully compared. In the energy markets, index position estimates based on agricultural markets are shown to contain considerable error relative to the CFTC's Index Investment Data (IID). Fama-MacBeth tests using the CFTC's quarterly IID find very little evidence that index positions influence returns or volatility in 19 commodity futures markets. Granger causality and long-horizon regression tests also show no causal links between daily returns or volatility in the crude oil and natural gas futures markets and the positions for two large energy exchange-traded index funds. Overall, the empirical results of this study offer no support for the Masters Hypothesis. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 269
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], IND INV DAT EXPL NOT
[2]  
[Anonymous], LARG TRAD REP SYST
[3]  
[Anonymous], MAGAZINE FUTURES JUN
[4]  
[Anonymous], FUND OBJ KEY FEAT
[5]  
[Anonymous], COMM FUT TRAD COMM A
[6]  
[Anonymous], DIS COMM TRAD REP EX
[7]  
[Anonymous], 0708 YAL U YAL ICF
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2010, J FINANC RES
[9]  
[Anonymous], FED REG
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1770 YAL U COWL FDN