Modification of boiler operating conditions for mercury emissions reductions in coal-fired utility boilers

US EPA's studies have determined that mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants pose significant hazards to public health and must be reduced. Coal-fired power plants represent a significant fraction of the anthropogenic emissions of mercury into the atmosphere. Mercury emissions are impacted by factors such as coal type, boiler operation, fly ash characteristics and type of environmental control equipment installed on the unit. Field data show a wide variation in the fraction of mercury that is emitted in the gaseous phase, as elemental and oxidized mercury vapor, and as particulate-bound mercury. Oxidized mercury is a preferable species because is less volatile at stack temperatures, water-soluble, and tends to interact with mineral matter and char, and cold-end air pollution control devices. There is also evidence that boiler-operating conditions could be used to influence mercury behavior in the boiler, since they affect the thermo-chemical conditions for mercury formation and reduction. However, operation of boiler control settings, which result in mercury removal benefits, should also consider the tradeoff between mercury reduction and other emissions (for example, NOx and CO), the level of unburned carbon in the fly ash, unit efficiency and the performance of particulate control equipment. This paper reports fieldwork performed to investigate the feasibility of affecting mercury emissions from coal-fired plants by manipulating boiler control settings. Full-scale testing was performed at two units. One of the units is equipped with a back-end train that includes a rotary air preheater followed by two electrostatic precipitators in series. The other unit is equipped with hot and cold precipitators and a tubular air preheater. A strategy for mercury control by selectively manipulating boiler control settings, if used in combination with other control measures such as sorbent injection, should provide a cost-effective option for mercury control. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.