Mathematical Structures in Group Decision-Making on Resource Allocation Distributions

被引:27
作者
Friedkin, Noah E. [1 ,2 ]
Proskurnikov, Anton, V [3 ,4 ]
Mei, Wenjun [5 ]
Bono, Francesco [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Sociol, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Ctr Control Dynam Syst & Computat, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Delft Ctr Syst & Control, NL-2628 CD Delft, Netherlands
[4] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Problems Mech Engn, St Petersburg 199178, Russia
[5] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Automat Control Lab, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[6] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Mech Engn, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
OPINION DYNAMICS; EVOLUTION; TUTORIAL; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-018-37847-2
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Optimal decisions on the distribution of finite resources are explicitly structured by mathematical models that specify relevant variables, constraints, and objectives. Here we report analysis and evidence that implicit mathematical structures are also involved in group decision-making on resource allocation distributions under conditions of uncertainty that disallow formal optimization. A group's array of initial distribution preferences automatically sets up a geometric decision space of alternative resource distributions. Weighted averaging mechanisms of interpersonal influence reduce the heterogeneity of the group's initial preferences on a suitable distribution. A model of opinion formation based on weighted averaging predicts a distribution that is a feasible point in the group's implicit initial decision space.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1959, Studies in social power
[2]   Optimally Interacting Minds [J].
Bahrami, Bahador ;
Olsen, Karsten ;
Latham, Peter E. ;
Roepstorff, Andreas ;
Rees, Geraint ;
Frith, Chris D. .
SCIENCE, 2010, 329 (5995) :1081-1085
[3]   Confidence matching in group decision-making [J].
Bang, Dan ;
Aitchison, Laurence ;
Moran, Rani ;
Castanon, Santiago Herce ;
Rafiee, Banafsheh ;
Mahmoodi, Ali ;
Lau, Jennifer Y. F. ;
Latham, Peter E. ;
Bahrami, Bahador ;
Summerfield, Christopher .
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2017, 1 (06)
[4]   How bad is forming your own opinion? [J].
Bindel, David ;
Kleinberg, Jon ;
Oren, Sigal .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2015, 92 :248-265
[5]   Kinetic model for multidimensional opinion formation [J].
Boudin, Laurent ;
Monaco, Roberto ;
Salvarani, Francesco .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2010, 81 (03)
[6]   Statistical physics of social dynamics [J].
Castellano, Claudio ;
Fortunato, Santo ;
Loreto, Vittorio .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2009, 81 (02) :591-646
[7]   Cultural Reception and Production: The Social Construction of Meaning in Book Clubs [J].
Childress, C. Clayton ;
Friedkin, Noah E. .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2012, 77 (01) :45-68
[8]   Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization [J].
Dandekar, Pranav ;
Goel, Ashish ;
Lee, David T. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (15) :5791-5796
[9]  
Deb Kalyanmoy., 2016, DECISION SCI THEORY, P145, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781315183176-4
[10]   REACHING A CONSENSUS [J].
DEGROOT, MH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1974, 69 (345) :118-121