(S)-Ketamine in Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Retrospective Study

被引:47
作者
Hoefler, Julia [1 ,2 ]
Rohracher, Alexandra [1 ,2 ]
Kalss, Gudrun [1 ,2 ]
Zimmermann, Georg [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dobesberger, Judith [1 ,2 ]
Pilz, Georg [1 ,2 ]
Leitinger, Markus [1 ,2 ]
Kuchukhidze, Giorgi [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Butz, Kevin [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Taylor, Alexandra [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Novak, Helmut [1 ,2 ]
Trinka, Eugen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Paracelsus Med Univ Salzburg, Christian Doppler Klin, Dept Neurol, Ignaz Harrer Str 79, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
[2] Ctr Cognit Neurosci, Salzburg, Austria
[3] Paris Lodron Univ, Dept Math, Salzburg, Austria
[4] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Neurol, Innsbruck, Austria
[5] Paris Lodron Univ, Dept Psychol, Salzburg, Austria
关键词
CONVULSIVE STATUS EPILEPTICUS; NONCONVULSIVE STATUS EPILEPTICUS; INTRAVENOUS KETAMINE; MORTALITY; THERAPY; IMPACT; COMA;
D O I
10.1007/s40263-016-0371-2
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective The aim was to describe the safety and efficacy of (S)-ketamine [(S)-KET] in a series of patients with refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus (RSE and SRSE) in a specialized neurological intensive care unit (NICU). Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with RSE and SRSE treated with (S)-KET in the NICU, Salzburg, Austria, from 2011 to 2015. Data collection included demographic features, clinical presentation, diagnosis, electroencephalogram (EEG) data, anticonvulsant treatment, timing, and duration of treatment with (S)-KET. Outcomes were seizure control and death. Results A total of 42 patients (14 women) with RSE and SRSE were treated with (S)-KET. The median duration of status epilepticus (SE) was 10 days [first quartile (Q1) 5.0, Q3 21.0]; the median latency from SE onset to the first administration of (S)-KET was 3 days (Q1 2.0, Q3 6.8). Prior to (S)-KET administration, patients had received a median of two (Q1 2.0, Q3 3.0) anesthetics and three (Q1 2.0, Q3 4.0) antiepileptic drugs. Forty percent of patients (17/42) received propofol: 65 % prior to (S)-KET; 35 % at the same time with (S)-KET. Seven patients received a median bolus of (S)-KET of 200 mg (Q1 200, Q3 250) followed by a continuous infusion, while 35 started with a continuous infusion (maximum rate median 2.55 mg/kg/h; Q1 2.09, Q3 3.22). In 64 % of patients (27/42), (S)-KET was the last drug before SE cessation; in five patients, it was given with propofol at the same time. Median duration of administration was 4 days (Q1 2.0, Q3 6.8). Overall (S)-KET treatment was well tolerated, adverse effects were not observed, and overall mortality was 45.2 %. Conclusions Treatment of SRSE in adult patients with (S)-KET led to resolution of status in 64 %. No adverse events were found, indicating a favorable safety profile.
引用
收藏
页码:869 / 876
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[21]   Predicting outcome of status epilepticus [J].
Leitinger, M. ;
Kalss, G. ;
Rohracher, A. ;
Pilz, G. ;
Novak, H. ;
Hoefler, J. ;
Deak, I. ;
Kuchukhidze, G. ;
Dobesberger, J. ;
Wakonig, A. ;
Trinka, E. .
EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2015, 49 :126-130
[22]   It's time to revise the definition of status epilepticus [J].
Lowenstein, DH ;
Bleck, T ;
Macdonald, RL .
EPILEPSIA, 1999, 40 (01) :120-122
[23]   Status Epilepticus: Impact of Therapeutic Coma on Outcome [J].
Marchi, Nicola A. ;
Novy, Jan ;
Faouzi, Mohamed ;
Staehli, Christine ;
Burnand, Bernard ;
Rossetti, Andrea O. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (05) :1003-1009
[24]  
Mayer SA, 2002, ARCH NEUROL-CHICAGO, V59, P2015
[25]   N-methyl-D-asparate receptor antagonists abolish the maintenance phase of self-sustaining status epilepticus in rat [J].
Mazarati, AM ;
Wasterlain, CG .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1999, 265 (03) :187-190
[26]  
OYE I, 1992, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V260, P1209
[27]   THE CHOICE OF STATISTICAL TESTS ILLUSTRATED ON THE INTERPRETATION OF DATA CLASSED IN A 2X2 TABLE [J].
PEARSON, ES .
BIOMETRIKA, 1947, 34 (1-2) :139-167
[28]   A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis [J].
Peduzzi, P ;
Concato, J ;
Kemper, E ;
Holford, TR ;
Feinstein, AR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 49 (12) :1373-1379
[29]  
Pournelle G. H., 1953, Journal of Mammalogy, V34, P133, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1421:SDEOLC]2.0.CO
[30]  
2