Maximising community wellbeing: Assessing the threats to the benefits communities derive from the marine estate

被引:20
作者
Gollan, Natalie [1 ,2 ]
Voyer, Michelle [3 ]
Jordan, Alan [1 ]
Barclay, Kate [2 ]
机构
[1] Port Stephens Fisheries Inst, New South Wales Dept Primary Ind Fisheries, Locked Bag 1, Nelson Bay, NSW 2315, Australia
[2] Univ Technol, Fac Arts & Social Sci, POB 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia
[3] Univ Wollongong, ANCORS, Bldg 233,Innovat Campus, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
关键词
Community wellbeing; Benefits; Marine estate; Sustainable development; Threats; Threat and risk assessment; RISK-ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; FISHERIES; MANAGEMENT; SCIENCE; POLICY; IMPLEMENTATION; CONSERVATION; INTEGRATION; ECOSYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.10.020
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
The coastal and marine environment is often managed according to the principles of sustainable development, which include environmental, economic, and social dimensions. While each are equally important, social sustainability receives a lower priority in both policy and research. Methodologies for assessing social sustainability are less developed than for environmental and economic sustainability, and there is a lack of data on the social aspects of sustainable development (such as social equity), which constitutes a barrier to understanding social considerations and integrating them into natural resource management. This paper explores a threat and risk assessment to the marine estate in New South Wales, Australia, which identified and categorised both the benefits that communities gain from the marine estate and the threats to those benefits. A broad range of benefits were identified including participation (e.g., socialising and sense of community), enjoyment (e.g., enjoying the biodiversity and beauty), cultural heritage and use, intrinsic and bequest values, the viability of businesses, and direct economic values. Threats to community benefits were categorised as resource use conflict, environmental, governance, public safety, critical knowledge gaps and lack of access. An integrated threat and risk assessment approach found that the priority threats to community benefits were environmental threats (e.g., water pollution), critical knowledge gaps (e.g., inadequate social and economic information), governance (e.g., lack of compliance), resource-use conflict (e.g., anti-social behaviour), and lack of access (e.g., loss of fishing access). Threat and risk assessment is an evidence-based tool that is useful for marine planning because it provides a structured approach to incorporating multiple types of knowledge and enables limited resources to be targeted to the threats identified as being most important to address.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 21
页数:10
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [41] Gough I, 2007, WELLBEING IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: FROM THEORY TO RESEARCH, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511488986
  • [42] Gough I, 2007, WELLBEING IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: FROM THEORY TO RESEARCH, P3, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511488986.002
  • [43] A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    Walbridge, Shaun
    Selkoe, Kimberly A.
    Kappel, Carrie V.
    Micheli, Fiorenza
    D'Agrosa, Caterina
    Bruno, John F.
    Casey, Kenneth S.
    Ebert, Colin
    Fox, Helen E.
    Fujita, Rod
    Heinemann, Dennis
    Lenihan, Hunter S.
    Madin, Elizabeth M. P.
    Perry, Matthew T.
    Selig, Elizabeth R.
    Spalding, Mark
    Steneck, Robert
    Watson, Reg
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2008, 319 (5865) : 948 - 952
  • [44] Achieving the triple bottom line in the face of inherent trade-offs among social equity, economic return, and conservation
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    Klein, Carissa J.
    Brown, Christopher J.
    Beger, Maria
    Grantham, Hedley S.
    Mangubhai, Sangeeta
    Ruckelshaus, Mary
    Tulloch, Vivitskaia J.
    Watts, Matt
    White, Crow
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (15) : 6229 - 6234
  • [45] Ecologically sustainable development: origins, implementation and challenges
    Harding, R
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2006, 187 (1-3) : 229 - 239
  • [46] Wellbeing and Sustainability: A Relational Approach
    Helne, Tuula
    Hirvilammi, Tuuli
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 23 (03) : 167 - 175
  • [47] Ecological risk assessment for the effects of fishing
    Hobday, A. J.
    Smith, A. D. M.
    Stobutzki, I. C.
    Bulman, C.
    Daley, R.
    Dambacher, J. M.
    Deng, R. A.
    Dowdney, J.
    Fuller, M.
    Furlani, D.
    Griffiths, S. P.
    Johnson, D.
    Kenyon, R.
    Knuckey, I. A.
    Ling, S. D.
    Pitcher, R.
    Sainsbury, K. J.
    Sporcic, M.
    Smith, T.
    Turnbull, C.
    Walker, T. I.
    Wayte, S. E.
    Webb, H.
    Williams, A.
    Wise, B. S.
    Zhou, S.
    [J]. FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2011, 108 (2-3) : 372 - 384
  • [48] Managing Threats to the Marine Estate in New South Wales (Australia) to Maximise Community Wellbeing
    Jordan, Alan
    Fairfull, Sarah
    Creese, Bob
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2016, : 642 - 646
  • [49] Adaptive social impact management for conservation and environmental management
    Kaplan-Hallam, Maery
    Bennett, Nathan J.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2018, 32 (02) : 304 - 314
  • [50] Communicating Stakeholder Priorities in the Great Barrier Reef Region
    Larson, Silva
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2009, 22 (07) : 650 - 664