Characteristics of Age-Friendly Bus Information

被引:3
|
作者
Broome, Kieran [1 ]
Worrall, Linda [2 ]
Fleming, Jennifer
Boldy, Duncan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Commun Disabil Ctr, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Curtin Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
OLDER-PEOPLE; ENVIRONMENT; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.5038/2375-0901.14.4.3
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Bus information is an important element to consider when developing and implementing age-friendly bus systems. Little is known regarding the bus information needs and preferences of older people. This study aims to illuminate characteristics of age-friendly bus information. Participant observations with stimulated recall interviews (n=40) were used to identify older peoples' (age 60 and over) perspectives on bus information. The data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. A printed information location checklist also was conducted. Categorical analysis identified that older people used a variety of information sources including printed information, telephone, Internet, bus drivers, word of mouth, and experience. Positive and negative characteristics of each source were identified. Older people also required a range of levels of information complexity. Popular locations for sourcing printed information included post offices, news agents, tourist information centers, and libraries. Transport providers and policy makers should consider the needs and preferences of older people when providing bus information. Effective information provision requires a range of media, covering a broad spectrum of information complexity and through a variety of locations.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 61
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Manifesto for the Age-Friendly Movement: Developing a New Urban Agenda
    Buffel, Tine
    Phillipson, Chris
    JOURNAL OF AGING & SOCIAL POLICY, 2018, 30 (02) : 173 - 192
  • [32] Do Age-Friendly Characteristics Influence the Expectation to Age in Place? A Comparison of Low-Income and Higher Income Detroit Elders
    Lehning, Amanda J.
    Smith, Richard J.
    Dunkle, Ruth E.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GERONTOLOGY, 2015, 34 (02) : 158 - 180
  • [33] Development of a contextualized index of multiple deprivation for age-friendly cities: Evidence from Hong Kong
    Chen, Shi
    Wang, Siqiang
    Sun, Yi
    Liu, Justina Yat Wa
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2024, 167
  • [34] Smart and Age-Friendly Cities in Romania: An Overview of Public Policy and Practice
    Ivan, Loredana
    Beu, Dorin
    van Hoof, Joost
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (14) : 1 - 25
  • [35] Neighborhood Influence: A Qualitative Study in Caceres, an Aspiring Age-Friendly City
    Dominguez-Parraga, Lidia
    SOCIAL SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 8 (06):
  • [36] Age-Friendly and Climate Resilient Communities: A Grey-Green Alliance
    Dabelko-Schoeny, Holly
    Dabelko, Geoffrey D.
    Rao, Smitha
    Damico, Melissa
    Doherty, Fiona C.
    Traver, Anthony C.
    Sheldon, Marisa
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2024, 64 (03)
  • [38] Creating age-friendly cities: prioritizing interventions with Q-methodology
    Atkins, Mariana T.
    INTERNATIONAL PLANNING STUDIES, 2020, 25 (04) : 303 - 319
  • [39] User perspective of age-friendly transportation: A case study of Taipei City
    Shiau, Tzay-An
    Huang, Wen-Kuan
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2014, 36 : 184 - 191
  • [40] Ten questions concerning age-friendly cities and communities and the built environment
    van Hoof, J.
    Marston, H. R.
    Kazak, J. K.
    Buffel, T.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 199