Characteristics of Age-Friendly Bus Information

被引:3
|
作者
Broome, Kieran [1 ]
Worrall, Linda [2 ]
Fleming, Jennifer
Boldy, Duncan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Commun Disabil Ctr, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Curtin Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
OLDER-PEOPLE; ENVIRONMENT; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.5038/2375-0901.14.4.3
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Bus information is an important element to consider when developing and implementing age-friendly bus systems. Little is known regarding the bus information needs and preferences of older people. This study aims to illuminate characteristics of age-friendly bus information. Participant observations with stimulated recall interviews (n=40) were used to identify older peoples' (age 60 and over) perspectives on bus information. The data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. A printed information location checklist also was conducted. Categorical analysis identified that older people used a variety of information sources including printed information, telephone, Internet, bus drivers, word of mouth, and experience. Positive and negative characteristics of each source were identified. Older people also required a range of levels of information complexity. Popular locations for sourcing printed information included post offices, news agents, tourist information centers, and libraries. Transport providers and policy makers should consider the needs and preferences of older people when providing bus information. Effective information provision requires a range of media, covering a broad spectrum of information complexity and through a variety of locations.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 61
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Priorities for an Age-Friendly Bus System
    Broome, Kieran
    Worrall, Linda
    McKenna, Kryss
    Boldy, Duncan
    CANADIAN JOURNAL ON AGING-REVUE CANADIENNE DU VIEILLISSEMENT, 2010, 29 (03): : 435 - 444
  • [2] Information Provision for an Age-Friendly Community
    Everingham, Jo-Anne
    Petriwskyj, Andrea
    Warburton, Jeni
    Cuthill, Michael
    Bartlett, Helen
    AGEING INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 34 (1-2): : 79 - 98
  • [3] Key characteristics of age-friendly cities and communities: A review
    Steels, Stephanie
    CITIES, 2015, 47 : 45 - 52
  • [4] Conceptualizing Age-Friendly Communities
    Menec, Verena H.
    Means, Robin
    Keating, Norah
    Parkhurst, Graham
    Eales, Jacquie
    CANADIAN JOURNAL ON AGING-REVUE CANADIENNE DU VIEILLISSEMENT, 2011, 30 (03): : 479 - 493
  • [6] Measurement Indicators of Age-Friendly Communities: Findings From the AARP Age-Friendly Community Survey
    Kim, Kyeongmo
    Buckley, Tommy
    Burnette, Denise
    Kim, Seon
    Cho, Sunghwan
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2022, 62 (01) : E17 - E27
  • [7] Age-friendly buses? A comparison of reported barriers and facilitators to bus use for younger and older adults
    Broome, Kieran
    Nalder, Emily
    Worrall, Linda
    Boldy, Duncan
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2010, 29 (01) : 33 - 38
  • [8] Defining a Framework for Age-Friendly Interventions
    Glicksman, Allen
    Ring, Lauren
    Kleban, Morton H.
    JOURNAL OF HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY, 2016, 30 (02) : 175 - 184
  • [9] Co-Designing Age-Friendly Neighborhood Spaces in Copenhagen: Starting with an Age-Friendly Co-Design Process
    Carroll, Sidse
    Nortoft, Kamilla
    ARCHITECTURE-SWITZERLAND, 2022, 2 (02): : 214 - 230
  • [10] Evaluation of age-friendly guidelines for public buses
    Broome, Kieran
    Worrall, Linda
    Fleming, Jennifer
    Boldy, Duncan
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2013, 53 : 68 - 80