Audit and Feedback to Surgery Interns and Residents on Prescribing Risk-Appropriate Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis

被引:4
|
作者
Aboagye, Jonathan K. [1 ]
Haut, Elliott R. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Streiff, Michael B. [4 ,6 ]
Hobson, Deborah B. [1 ,7 ]
Kraus, Peggy S. [8 ]
Shaffer, Dauryne L. [1 ,7 ]
Holzmueller, Christine G. [4 ]
Lau, Brandyn D. [4 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Acute Care Surg, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Armstrong Inst Patient Safety & Qual, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Hematol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Nursing, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Pharm, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[9] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci Div Hlt, Baltimore, MD USA
[10] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Div Hlth Sci Informat, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
venous thromboembolism; education; audit; feedback; residents; prophylaxis; BLOOD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; QUALITY; PERFORMANCE; PREVENTION; PHYSICIANS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.03.017
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of feedback using an emailed scorecard and a web-based dashboard on risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis prescribing practices among general surgery interns and residents. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: The Johns Hopkins Hospital, an urban academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: All 45 trainees (19 post-graduate year [PGY] 1 interns and 26 PGY-2 to PGY-5 residents) in our general surgery program. INTERVENTION: Feedback implementation encompassed three sequential periods: (1) scorecard (July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2015); (2) no feedback/wash-in (July 1 through October 31, 2015); and (3) web-based dashboard (November 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016). No feedback served as the baseline period for the intern cohort. The scorecard was a static document showing an individual's compliance with risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis prescription compared to compliance of their de-identified peers. The web-based dashboard included other information (e.g., patient details for suboptimal prophylaxis orders) besides individual compliance compared to their de- identified peers. Trainees could access the dashboard anytime to view current and historic performance. We sent monthly emails to all trainees for both feedback mechanisms. Main outcome was proportion of patients prescribed risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis, and mean percentages reported. RESULTS: During this study, 4088 VTE prophylaxis orders were placed. Among residents, mean prescription of risk-appropriate prophylaxis was higher in the wash-in (98.4% vs 95.6%, p < 0.001) and dashboard (98.4 vs 95.6%, p < 0.001) periods compared to the scorecard period. There was no difference in mean compliance between the wash-in and dashboard periods (98.4% vs 98.4%, p = 0.99). Among interns, mean prescription of risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis improved between the wash-in and dashboard periods (91.5% vs 96.4%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Using audit and individualized performance feedback to general surgery trainees through a web-based dashboard improved prescribing of appropriate VTE prophylaxis to a near-perfect performance. ((C) 2021 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:2011 / 2019
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An audit of prescribing of prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in medical patients
    MacLeod, L. M.
    PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE, 2007, 29 (03): : A272 - A273
  • [2] PROPHYLAXIS OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM: ENSURING APPROPRIATE PRESCRIBING AND RELIABLE DATA COLLECTION
    Ziff, Oliver
    Carter, Paul R.
    Coombs, Ben
    Signorini, Gianpietro
    Pye, Seonaird
    Laing, Chris
    Bakhai, Ameet
    HEART, 2016, 102 : A55 - A55
  • [3] A clinical audit investigating the use of venous thromboembolism (vte) risk assessments in the mater misericordiae university hospital (mmuh) and appropriate prescribing of prophylaxis
    Hickey, A.
    Dunlea, E.
    Ainle, Ni F.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 188 : S34 - S35
  • [4] Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for spinal surgery: a re-audit
    Varadan, R.
    Sinha, V.
    Lanka, P.
    Pallipalayam, V.
    Pandidurai, U.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 70 : 43 - 43
  • [5] Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis risk assessment in a general surgery cohort: a closed-loop audit
    McGoldrick, D. M.
    Redmond, H. P.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 186 (03) : 743 - 745
  • [6] Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis risk assessment in a general surgery cohort: a closed-loop audit
    D. M. McGoldrick
    H. P. Redmond
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2017, 186 : 743 - 745
  • [7] A review of completed audit cycles of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in ENT surgery
    Huang, W. H.
    Keane, E.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 186 : S99 - S99
  • [8] Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guideline implementation is improved by nurse directed feedback and audit
    Gibbs H.
    Fletcher J.
    Blombery P.
    Collins R.
    Wheatley D.
    Thrombosis Journal, 9 (1)
  • [9] Audit of risk assessment and prophylaxis provision for venous thromboembolism in surgical patients
    Burdall, O.
    Ben-sassi, A.
    Wood, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 : 176 - 176
  • [10] Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in surgery
    Verhaeghe, R
    Verstraete, M
    ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, 1997, 97 (03) : 106 - 109