Awake Single-Stage Bilateral Clavicle Surgeries Under Bilateral Clavipectoral Fascial Plane Blocks: A Case Report and Review of Literature

被引:6
作者
Sonawane, Kartik [1 ]
Dharmapuri, Saisrivas [1 ]
Saxena, Shlok [1 ]
Mistry, Tuhin [1 ]
Balavenkatasubramanian, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ganga Med Ctr & Hosp Private Ltd, Anesthesiol, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
clavicle surgery; modified clavipectoral fascial plane block; awake clavicle surgery; clavipectoral fascial plane block; fascial plane block; bilateral clavicle fracture; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; TRUNK BLOCK; FRACTURE; ANALGESIA; EPIDEMIOLOGY; PATIENT; NERVE;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.20537
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The clavicle is a frequently fractured bone with an infrequent bilateral occurrence. Regional anesthesia (RA) for clavicle surgeries is always challenging due to its complex innervations arising from the two plexuses (cervical and brachial). Various RA techniques described for clavicle surgeries include plexus blocks, fascial plane blocks, and truncal blocks. Plexus blocks are associated with undesirable effects, such as phrenic nerve blockade and paralysis of the entire upper limb, limiting their application for bilateral clavicle surgeries. The clavipectoral fascial plane block (CPB) is a novel, procedure-specific, phrenic-sparing, and motor-sparing RA technique that can provide anesthesia or analgesia for clavicle surgeries. The decision to use the CPB and/or other RA techniques may depend on the site of clavicle injury or variations in clavicular innervation. We report a case of single-stage bilateral clavicle surgery successfully managed with a bilateral CPB alone using ultrasound guidance and landmark guidance separately. The patient was kept awake and comfortable throughout the surgery. In conclusion, CPB can be an effective alternate RA technique in avoiding undesired side effects of more proximal techniques such as phrenic nerve involvement and motor blockade of upper limbs. Landmark-guided CPB can be an alternative with equianalgesic efficacy as of ultrasound-guided CPB in resource-poor or emergency settings.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[31]  
Sampaio C., 2021, REGION ANESTH PAIN M, V70, pA98, DOI [10.1136/rapm-2021-ESRA.186, DOI 10.1136/RAPM-2021-ESRA.186]
[32]   Awake clavicle surgery with PECS1 and ultrasound selective supraclavicular nerve block combination [J].
Sanllorente-Sebastian, Rodrigo ;
Wilk, Piotr ;
Garces-Perez, Gloria Maria ;
Arias-Rodriguez, Luis ;
Andres-Pedrosa, Maria ;
Martinez-Ibeas, Elena .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2020, 66
[33]   The PECS II block as a major analgesic component for clavicle operations: A description of 7 case reports [J].
Schuitemaker R, J. B. ;
Sala-Blanch, X. ;
Rodriguez-Perez, C. L. ;
Mayoral R, J. T. ;
Lopez-Pantaleon, L. A. ;
Sanchez-Cohen, A. P. .
REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION, 2018, 65 (01) :53-58
[34]   OSTEOSYNTHESIS OF IRREDUCIBLE FRACTURES OF THE CLAVICLE WITH 2.7-MM ASIF PLATES [J].
SCHWARZ, N ;
HOCKER, K .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1992, 33 (02) :179-183
[35]  
Singh SK, 2015, ANAESTH PAIN INTENSI, V19, P323
[36]   Selective blockade of supraclavicular nerves and upper trunk of brachial plexus "The SCUT block" towards a site-specific regional anaesthesia strategy for clavicle surgeries-A descriptive study [J].
Sivashanmugam, T. ;
Areti, Archana ;
Selvum, E. ;
Diwan, Sandeep ;
Pandian, Arun .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 65 (09) :656-661
[37]  
Sonawane K Dixit H., 2021, OPEN J ORTHOPEDICS R, V6, P019
[38]  
Sutherland A G, 2000, Acta Orthop Belg, V66, P306
[39]   Analgesia for Clavicular Fracture and Surgery A Call for Evidence [J].
Tran, De Q. H. ;
Tiyaprasertkul, Worakamol ;
Gonzalez, Andrea P. .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2013, 38 (06) :539-543
[40]   Cervical erector spinae plane block catheter using a thoracic approach: an alternative to brachial plexus blockade for forequarter amputation [J].
Tsui, Ban C. H. ;
Mohler, David ;
Caruso, Thomas J. ;
Horn, Jean Louis .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2019, 66 (01) :119-120