Measurement properties of the six-minute pegboard and ring test (6PBRT) in healthy adolescents

被引：4

作者：

Leite, Hercules Ribeiro ^{[1
,2
]}

Queiroz, Ilkilene Pinheiro ^{[1
]}

Santos, Julia Goncalves ^{[1
]}

Barroso de Souza, Fernanda Lorena ^{[1
]}

Scheidt Figueiredo, Pedro Henrique ^{[1
]}

Lanza, Fernanda de Cordoba ^{[2
]}

de Deus, Franciele Angelo ^{[1
]}

Cunha Neves, Camila Danielle ^{[3
]}

Soares, Bruno Alvarenga ^{[1
]}

Tsopanoglou, Sabrina Pinheiro ^{[2
]}

Lima, Vanessa Pereira ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Fed Vales Jequitinhonha & Mucuri UFVJM, Dept Fisioterapia, Programa Posgrad Reabilitacao & Desempenho Func, Campus JK, Alto Da Jacuba, MG, Brazil

[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais UFMG, Dept Fisioterapia, Programa Posgrad Ciencias Reabilitacao, Escola Educ Fis Fisioterapia & Terapia Ocupac EEF, Av Antonio Carlos, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

[3] Fac Sete Lagoas FACSETE, Curso Fisioterapia, Sete Lagoas, MG, Brazil

来源：

JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES | 2021年 / 28卷

关键词：

Six-minute pegboard and ring test; Upper limb; Adolescent; Field test; Reproducibility; CARDIORESPIRATORY FITNESS; WALK TEST; CHILDREN; PERFORMANCE; GUIDELINES; AGREEMENT; STRENGTH;

D O I：

10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.08.002

中图分类号：

R49 [康复医学];

学科分类号：

100215 ;

摘要：

Objectives: To investigate the cardiorespiratory responses to the 6-min pegboard and ring test (6PBRT) and to assess its reproducibility in healthy adolescents. Methods: It was a cross-sectional study with 52 healthy adolescents (11-18 years old of both genders). The 6PBRT was performed twice on two different days by the same examiner. Intra-rater reliability, percentage of the minimal difference chance (MDC%) and agreement of the number of moving rings were analyzed. Also, cardiopulmonary parameters were collected before and after tests. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the number of rings moved was 0.87 (95%CI 0.69-0.93). The mean number of moved rings during the second test was higher. The MDC% with a 95 % confidence interval was greater than acceptable values. Bland-Altman analysis did not show agreement between measurements (bias 1/4 30.1); with upper and lower limits of agreement of-67.8 to 127.9, respectively. There was a significant increase in dyspnea, fatigue and HR values at the end of the tests (p < 0.0001). In both tests, participants reached HR equivalent to 48 % of the maximum predicted. Conclusion: Together, the results suggest that the 6PBRT is not a reliable measure for a population of healthy adolescents, which indicates the necessity to perform more than one test. The 6PBRT is suggested to be a submaximal test for this population. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：56 / 61

页数：6