Measurement properties of the six-minute pegboard and ring test (6PBRT) in healthy adolescents

被引:3
|
作者
Leite, Hercules Ribeiro [1 ,2 ]
Queiroz, Ilkilene Pinheiro [1 ]
Santos, Julia Goncalves [1 ]
Barroso de Souza, Fernanda Lorena [1 ]
Scheidt Figueiredo, Pedro Henrique [1 ]
Lanza, Fernanda de Cordoba [2 ]
de Deus, Franciele Angelo [1 ]
Cunha Neves, Camila Danielle [3 ]
Soares, Bruno Alvarenga [1 ]
Tsopanoglou, Sabrina Pinheiro [2 ]
Lima, Vanessa Pereira [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Vales Jequitinhonha & Mucuri UFVJM, Dept Fisioterapia, Programa Posgrad Reabilitacao & Desempenho Func, Campus JK, Alto Da Jacuba, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais UFMG, Dept Fisioterapia, Programa Posgrad Ciencias Reabilitacao, Escola Educ Fis Fisioterapia & Terapia Ocupac EEF, Av Antonio Carlos, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[3] Fac Sete Lagoas FACSETE, Curso Fisioterapia, Sete Lagoas, MG, Brazil
关键词
Six-minute pegboard and ring test; Upper limb; Adolescent; Field test; Reproducibility; CARDIORESPIRATORY FITNESS; WALK TEST; CHILDREN; PERFORMANCE; GUIDELINES; AGREEMENT; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.08.002
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: To investigate the cardiorespiratory responses to the 6-min pegboard and ring test (6PBRT) and to assess its reproducibility in healthy adolescents. Methods: It was a cross-sectional study with 52 healthy adolescents (11-18 years old of both genders). The 6PBRT was performed twice on two different days by the same examiner. Intra-rater reliability, percentage of the minimal difference chance (MDC%) and agreement of the number of moving rings were analyzed. Also, cardiopulmonary parameters were collected before and after tests. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the number of rings moved was 0.87 (95%CI 0.69-0.93). The mean number of moved rings during the second test was higher. The MDC% with a 95 % confidence interval was greater than acceptable values. Bland-Altman analysis did not show agreement between measurements (bias 1/4 30.1); with upper and lower limits of agreement of-67.8 to 127.9, respectively. There was a significant increase in dyspnea, fatigue and HR values at the end of the tests (p < 0.0001). In both tests, participants reached HR equivalent to 48 % of the maximum predicted. Conclusion: Together, the results suggest that the 6PBRT is not a reliable measure for a population of healthy adolescents, which indicates the necessity to perform more than one test. The 6PBRT is suggested to be a submaximal test for this population. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 61
页数:6
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Reference values for the six-minute pegboard and ring test in healthy adults in Brazil
    Lima, Vanessa Pereira
    Almeida, Fabiana Damasceno
    Janaudis-Ferreira, Tania
    Carmona, Bianca
    Ribeiro-Samora, Giane Amorim
    Velloso, Marcelo
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE PNEUMOLOGIA, 2018, 44 (03) : 190 - 194
  • [2] The 6-Minute Pegboard and Ring Test (6PBRT) for Evaluation of Upper Limbs Functional Capacity in Hemodialysis Patients: A Validation Study
    Lima, Vanessa Pereira
    Lopes, Paulo Henrique
    Costa, Henrique Silveira
    Costa, Maria Carolina Barbosa
    Rocha, Jefferson Freitas
    Rodrigues, Vanessa Gomes Brandao
    Maciel, Emilio Henrique Barroso
    Alves, Frederico Lopes
    Prates, Maria Cecilia Sales Mendes
    Campos, Patricia Cardoso
    Lacerda, Ana Cristina Rodrigues
    Figueiredo, Pedro Henrique Scheidt
    PHYSIOTHERAPY CANADA, 2023,
  • [3] Comparative analysis of the six-minute walk test in healthy children and adolescents
    Aquino, Evanirso S.
    Mourao, Flavio A. G.
    Souza, Roberta K. V.
    Glicerio, Braulio M.
    Coelho, Cristiane C.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2010, 14 (01) : 75 - 80
  • [4] Comparing modalities of conducting the six-minute walk test in healthy children and adolescents
    Rauchenzauner, Markus
    Schneider, Johanna
    Colleselli, Valeria
    Ruepp, Monika
    Cortina, Gerard
    Hoegler, Wolfgang
    Neururer, Sabrina
    Geiger, Ralf
    MINERVA PEDIATRICA, 2019, 71 (03) : 229 - 234
  • [5] Reference Values for the Six-Minute Walk Test in Healthy Children and Adolescents: a Systematic Review
    Pereira Cacau, Lucas de Assis
    de Santana-Filho, Valter Joviniano
    Maynard, Luana G.
    Gomes Neto, Mansueto
    Fernandes, Marcelo
    Carvalho, Vitor Oliveira
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 31 (05) : 381 - 388
  • [6] Six-minute walk test in obese children and adolescents: reproducibility and validity
    Morinder, Gunilla
    Mattsson, Eva
    Sollander, Clara
    Marcus, Claude
    Larsson, Ulla
    PHYSIOTHERAPY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 14 (02) : 91 - 104
  • [7] Cardiorespiratory and metabolic demand of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test in healthy young adults
    Fonseca, Alenice Aliane
    Figueiredo, Pedro Henrique Scheidt
    Costa, Henrique Silveira
    Mota, Lana Thais Costa
    de Deus, Franciele Angelo
    Cardoso, Renato Fleury
    da Fonseca, Sueli Ferreira
    Janaudis-Ferreira, Tania
    Lacerda, Ana Cristina Rodrigues
    Lima, Vanessa Pereira
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2022, 29 : 99 - 105
  • [8] Test-retest reliability of the unsupported upper-limb exercise test (UULEX) and 6-min peg board ring test (6PBRT) in healthy adult individuals
    Lima, Vanessa Pereira
    Velloso, Marcelo
    Almeida, Fabiana Damasceno
    Carmona, Bianca
    Ribeiro-Samora, Giane Amorim
    Janaudis-Ferreira, Tania
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2018, 34 (10) : 806 - 812
  • [9] Validity and reliability of 6-minute pegboard and ring test in patients with asthma
    Calik-Kutukcu, Ebru
    Tekerlek, Haluk
    Bozdemir-Ozel, Cemile
    Karaduz, Beyza Nur
    Cakmak, Aslihan
    Inal-Ince, Deniz
    Saglam, Melda
    Vardar-Yagli, Naciye
    Sonbahar-Ulu, Hazal
    Firat, Merve
    Arikan, Hulya
    Kaya, Saltuk Bugra
    Karakaya, Gul
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2022, 59 (07) : 1387 - 1395
  • [10] Six-minute walk test in healthy British service personnel
    O'Sullivan, Oliver
    Felton, J.
    Mclean, S.
    Bennett, A. N.
    BMJ MILITARY HEALTH, 2024,