Online training in evidence-based medicine and research methods for GP registrars: a mixed-methods evaluation of engagement and impact

被引:8
|
作者
Rahimi-Ardabili, Hania [1 ]
Spooner, Catherine [1 ]
Harris, Mark F. [1 ]
Magin, Parker [2 ,3 ]
Tam, Chun Wah Michael [4 ]
Liaw, Siaw-Teng [5 ]
Zwar, Nicholas [6 ]
机构
[1] UNSW Sydney, Ctr Primary Hlth Care & Equ, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] GP Synergy, Res & Evaluat Unit, Sydney, NSW 2304, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Callaghan, NSW 2304, Australia
[4] South Western Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Primary & Integrated Care Unit, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
[5] UNSW Sydney, Sch Populat Hlth, WHO Collaborating Ctr eHlth, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[6] Bond Univ, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, Gold Coast 4229, Australia
关键词
Evidence-based medicine; Online education; GP; Clinical practice; Mixed methods; RESPIRATORY-TRACT INFECTIONS; GENERAL-PRACTICE; TRAINEES; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-021-02916-0
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is a core skillset for enhancing the quality and safety of patients' care. Online EBM education could improve clinicians' skills in EBM, particularly when it is conducted during vocational training. There are limited studies on the impact of online EBM training on clinical practice among general practitioner (GP) registrars (trainees in specialist general practice). We aimed to describe and evaluate the acceptability, utility, satisfaction and applicability of the GP registrars experience with the online course. The course was developed by content-matter experts with educational designers to encompass effective teaching methods (e.g. it was interactive and used multiple teaching methods). Methods Mixed-method data collection was conducted after individual registrars' completion of the course. The course comprised six modules that aimed to increase knowledge of research methods and application of EBM skills to everyday practice. GP registrars who completed the online course during 2016-2020 were invited to complete an online survey about their experience and satisfaction with the course. Those who completed the course within the six months prior to data collection were invited to participate in semi-structured phone interviews about their experience with the course and the impact of the course on clinical practice. A thematic analysis approach was used to analyse the data from qualitative interviews. Results The data showed the registrars were generally positive towards the course and the concept of EBM. They stated that the course improved their confidence, knowledge, and skills and consequently impacted their practice. The students perceived the course increased their understanding of EBM with a Cohen's d of 1.6. Registrars identified factors that influenced the impact of the course. Of those, some were GP-related including their perception of EBM, and being comfortable with what they already learnt; some were work-place related such as time, the influence of supervisors, access to resources; and one was related to patient preferences. Conclusions This study showed that GP registrars who attended the online course reported that it improved their knowledge, confidence, skill and practice of EBM over the period of three months. The study highlights the supervisor's role on GP registrars' ability in translating the EBM skills learnt in to practice and suggests exploring the effect of EBM training for supervisors.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Last Aid Training Online: Participants' and Facilitators' Perceptions from a Mixed-Methods Study in Rural Scotland
    Macaden, Leah
    Broadfoot, Kirsten
    Carolan, Clare
    Muirhead, Kevin
    Neylon, Siobhan
    Keen, Jeremy
    HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (05)
  • [42] The impact of the lesson study model on students' mathematics achievement and attitudes: a mixed-methods research
    Aykan, Ahmet
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LESSON AND LEARNING STUDIES, 2024, 13 (04) : 397 - 415
  • [43] Use of an evidence-based health portal to improve teaching and learning in primary care: a mixed methods evaluation
    José Roberto Bittencourt Costa
    Luiz Anastacio Alves
    Anael Viana Pinto Alberto
    Cristina Alves Magalhães de Souza
    BMC Medical Education, 21
  • [44] Use of an evidence-based health portal to improve teaching and learning in primary care: a mixed methods evaluation
    Costa, Jose Roberto Bittencourt
    Alves, Luiz Anastacio
    Alberto, Anael Viana Pinto
    de Souza, Cristina Alves Magalhaes
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [45] A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Licensed Masters-Level Social Worker's Engagement in Outcome Evaluation
    Washburn, Micki
    Parrish, Danielle E.
    Oxhandler, Holly K.
    Ma, Anny K.
    Garrison, Brianna
    RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2022, 32 (02) : 186 - 198
  • [46] Role of team dynamics in the learning process: a mixed-methods evaluation of a modified team-based learning approach in a behavioral research methods course
    Walker, Elizabeth Reisinger
    Lang, Delia L.
    Caruso, Bethany A.
    Salas-Hernandez, Leslie
    ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2020, 25 (02) : 383 - 399
  • [47] Role of team dynamics in the learning process: a mixed-methods evaluation of a modified team-based learning approach in a behavioral research methods course
    Elizabeth Reisinger Walker
    Delia L. Lang
    Bethany A. Caruso
    Leslie Salas-Hernández
    Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2020, 25 : 383 - 399
  • [48] Determinants of Evidence-based Practice Uptake in Rural Intensive Care Units A Mixed Methods Study
    Sterba, Katherine R.
    Johnson, Emily E.
    Nadig, Nandita
    Simpson, Annie N.
    Simpson, Kit N.
    Goodwin, Andrew J.
    Beeks, Rebecca
    Warr, Emily H.
    Zapka, Jane
    Ford, Dee W.
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2020, 17 (09) : 1104 - 1116
  • [49] A mixed-methods study of system-level sustainability of evidence-based practices in 12 large-scale implementation initiatives
    Scudder, Ashley T.
    Taber-Thomas, Sarah M.
    Schaffner, Kristen
    Pemberton, Joy R.
    Hunter, Leah
    Herschell, Amy D.
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2017, 15 : 102
  • [50] A mixed-methods study of system-level sustainability of evidence-based practices in 12 large-scale implementation initiatives
    Ashley T. Scudder
    Sarah M. Taber-Thomas
    Kristen Schaffner
    Joy R. Pemberton
    Leah Hunter
    Amy D. Herschell
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 15