Using a Delphi process to determine optimal care for patients with pancreatic cancer

被引:8
作者
Burmeister, Elizabeth A. [1 ,4 ]
Jordan, Susan J. [1 ]
O'Connell, Dianne L. [6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
Beesley, Vanessa L. [1 ]
Goldstein, David [8 ,10 ]
Gooden, Helen M. [9 ]
Janda, Monika [2 ]
Merrett, Neil D. [11 ,12 ]
Wyld, David [3 ,5 ]
Neale, Rachel E. [1 ]
机构
[1] QIMR Berghofer Med Res Inst, 300 Herston Rd, Brisbane, Qld 4029, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Sch Publ Hlth, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[5] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[6] NSW Canc Council, Woolloomooloo, NSW, Australia
[7] Univ Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
[8] Univ New S Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia
[9] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[10] Prince Wales Hosp, Randwick, NSW, Australia
[11] Univ Western Sydney, Penrith, NSW 1797, Australia
[12] Bankstown Hosp, Bankstown, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Delivery of health care; Delphi technique; health services needs and demand; pancreatic neoplasm; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; HOSPITAL VOLUME; ADENOCARCINOMA; GEMCITABINE; DIAGNOSIS; MORTALITY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1111/ajco.12450
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: Overall 5-year survival for pancreatic cancer is similar to 5%. Optimizing the care that pancreatic cancer patients receive may be one way of improving outcomes. The objective of this study was to establish components of care which Australian health professionals believe important to optimally manage patients with pancreatic cancer. Methods: Using a Delphi process, a multidisciplinary panel of 250 health professionals were invited to provide a list of factors they considered important for optimal care of pancreatic cancer patients. They were then asked to score and then rescore ( from one [ no importance/disagree] to 10 [ very important/agree]) the factors. The mean and coefficient of variation scores were calculated and categorized into three levels of importance. Results: Overall, 63 ( 66% of those sent the final questionnaire; 25% of those initially invited) health professionals from nine disciplines completed the final scoring of 55 statements/factors encompassing themes of presentation/staging, surgery and biliary obstruction, multidisciplinary team details and oncology. Mean scores ranged from 3.7 to 9.7 with the highest related to communication and patient assessment. There was substantial intra-and interdisciplinary variation in views about MDT membership and roles. Conclusion: Overall, the opinions of Australian health professionals reflect international guideline recommended care; however, they identified a number of additional factors focusing on where patients should be treated, the importance of clear communication and the need for multidisciplinary care which were not included in current clinical practice guidelines. Differences in priorities between specialty groups were also identified.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 114
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[2]  
[Anonymous], J INTERGR ONCOL
[3]  
[Anonymous], NCCN PRACT GUID PANC
[4]  
[Anonymous], ABC TECHNOLOGY 0920
[5]  
[Anonymous], INQUIRY TELEHEALTH S
[6]  
[Anonymous], CANC INC MORT PROJ 2
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2012, 33030 AUSTR BUR STAT
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2007, PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT, DOI DOI 10.7275/PDZ9-TH90
[9]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2012, CANC SURV PREV AUSTR
[10]   Consensus Statements for Management of Barrett's Dysplasia and Early-Stage Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Based on a Delphi Process [J].
Bennett, Cathy ;
Vakil, Nimish ;
Bergman, Jacques ;
Harrison, Rebecca ;
Odze, Robert ;
Vieth, Michael ;
Sanders, Scott ;
Gay, Laura ;
Pech, Oliver ;
Longcroft-Wheaton, Gaius ;
Romero, Yvonne ;
Inadomi, John ;
Tack, Jan ;
Corley, Douglas A. ;
Manner, Hendrik ;
Green, Susi ;
Al Dulaimi, David ;
Ali, Haythem ;
Allum, Bill ;
Anderson, Mark ;
Curtis, Howard ;
Falk, Gary ;
Fennerty, M. Brian ;
Fullarton, Grant ;
Krishnadath, Kausilia ;
Meltzer, Stephen J. ;
Armstrong, David ;
Ganz, Robert ;
Cengia, Gianpaolo ;
Going, James J. ;
Goldblum, John ;
Gordon, Charles ;
Grabsch, Heike ;
Haigh, Chris ;
Hongo, Michio ;
Johnston, David ;
Forbes-Young, Ricky ;
Kay, Elaine ;
Kaye, Philip ;
Lerut, Toni ;
Lovat, Laurence B. ;
Lundell, Lars ;
Mairs, Philip ;
Shimoda, Tadakuza ;
Spechler, Stuart ;
Sontag, Stephen ;
Malfertheiner, Peter ;
Murray, Iain ;
Nanji, Manoj ;
Poller, David .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 143 (02) :336-346