A comparison of RAPD versus microsatellite DNA markers in population studies of the massasauga rattlesnake

被引:36
|
作者
Lougheed, SC [1 ]
Gibbs, HL
Prior, KA
Weatherhead, PJ
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Dept Biol, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Biol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Canadian Wildlife Serv, Endangered Species Div, Hull, PQ, Canada
[4] Carleton Univ, Dept Biol, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jhered/91.6.458
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We compared genetic differentiation among populations of the threatened massasauga rattlesnake (Sistrurus c. catenatus) using two types of nuclear molecular markers: randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers and microsatellites. Analyses of molecular variance (AMOVA) and G(ST) and F-ST analyses Indicated that levels of among-population differentiation between regional populations (>100 km) were comparable for both markers. However, microsatellites were superior in population assignment tests and at discerning fine-scale genetic differentiation between subpopulations separated by tens of kilometers. These results argue that both types of markers are suitable for defining broad-scale genetic structures in snake populations and can provide important inputs into conservation Initiatives of focal taxa. However, our analyses suggest that microsatellites are better for detecting structure at limited spatial scales.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / 463
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Utility of a set of microsatellite primers developed for the massasauga rattlesnake (Sistrurus catenatus) for population genetic studies of the timber rattlesnake (Crotalus horridus)
    Anderson, Corey Devin
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY NOTES, 2006, 6 (02): : 514 - 517
  • [2] Characterization of DNA microsatellite loci from a threatened snake:: The eastern massasauga rattlesnake (Sistrurus c. catenatus) and their use in population studies
    Gibbs, HL
    Prior, K
    Parent, C
    JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 1998, 89 (02) : 169 - 173
  • [3] Genetic structure of populations of the threatened eastern massasauga rattlesnake, Sistrurus c catenatus: evidence from microsatellite DNA markers
    Gibbs, HL
    Prior, KA
    Weatherhead, PJ
    Johnson, G
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 1997, 6 (12) : 1123 - 1132
  • [4] Microsatellite DNA markers for population genetic studies in the dinoflagellate Karenia brevis
    Renshaw, Mark A.
    Soltysiak, Kelly
    Arreola, Daniel
    Loret, Pascal
    Patton, John C.
    Gold, John R.
    Campbell, Lisa
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY NOTES, 2006, 6 (04): : 1157 - 1159
  • [5] Microsatellite markers of Gonystylus bancanus (Thymelaeaceae) for population genetic studies and DNA fingerprinting
    Kevin Kit Siong Ng
    Soon Leong Lee
    Chin Hong Ng
    Lee Hong Tnah
    Chai Ting Lee
    Naoki Tani
    Conservation Genetics Resources, 2009, 1
  • [6] Microsatellite markers of Gonystylus bancanus (Thymelaeaceae) for population genetic studies and DNA fingerprinting
    Kevin Kit Siong Ng
    Soon Leong Lee
    Chin Hong Ng
    Lee Hong Tnah
    Chai Ting Lee
    Naoki Tani
    CONSERVATION GENETICS RESOURCES, 2009, 1 (01) : 153 - 157
  • [7] The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis
    Powell, W
    Morgante, M
    Andre, C
    Hanafey, M
    Vogel, J
    Tingey, S
    Rafalski, A
    MOLECULAR BREEDING, 1996, 2 (03) : 225 - 238
  • [8] POTENTIAL RAPD MARKERS FOR POPULATION STUDIES IN TREE LEGUMES
    Gomez, S. Michael
    Ramasubramanian, T.
    Mohankumar, S.
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2011, 43 (04) : 1879 - 1883
  • [9] Microsatellite DNA markers for population-genetic studies of Labeo dyocheilus (McClelland, 1839)
    Mohindra, V
    Narain, L
    Punia, P
    Gopalakrishnan, A
    Mandal, A
    Kapoor, D
    Ponniah, AG
    Lal, KK
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ICHTHYOLOGY, 2005, 21 (06) : 478 - 482
  • [10] Microsatellite DNA markers for population genetic studies and parentage assignment in cobia, Rachycentron canadum
    Pruett, CL
    Saillant, E
    Renshaw, MA
    Patton, JC
    Rexroad, CE
    Gold, JR
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY NOTES, 2005, 5 (01): : 84 - 86