Informed consent and neuropsychological assessment: Ethical considerations and proposed guidelines

被引：7
|
作者：
Johnson-Greene, D
Hardy-Morais, C
Adams, KM
Hardy, C
Bergloff, P
机构：
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Baltimore, MD 21239 USA
[2] Univ Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
[3] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Ann Arbor Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Inst Rehabil & Res, Houston, TX USA
来源：
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST | 1997年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1080/13854049708400478
中图分类号：
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号：
040203 ;
摘要：
The rationale for obtaining informed consent from patients contains a number of legal, ethical, and moral arguments that are well entrenched in the medical community but which have been embraced only recently by psychologists. The current Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (1992) elucidate informed consent guidelines for treatment and research, but do not provide the same degree of clarity concerning informed consent for clinical assessment. The purpose of this paper is to open a dialogue about the use of informed consent in neuropsychological assessment and to provide proposed recommendations for obtaining informed consent from patients receiving neuropsychological evaluations.
引用
收藏
页码：454 / 460
页数：7
相关论文
共 50 条
12345