An Analysis on the Influence of R&D Fiscal and Tax Subsidies on Regional Innovation Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China

被引:16
|
作者
Liu, Weijiang [1 ]
Bai, Yue [2 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Ctr Quantitat Econ, Changchun 130012, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Sch Business, Changchun 130012, Peoples R China
关键词
regional innovation efficiency; DEA-Malmquist; R&D fiscal and tax subsidies; government subsidies; pretax additional deduction policy; GOVERNMENT SUPPORT; INDUSTRIES; SYSTEMS; IMPACT; MATTER; FIRMS;
D O I
10.3390/su132212707
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To promote the National Mid-andLong-Term Scientific and Technical Development Program, utilizing the technical innovation data from 30 provinces of China from2002-2016, this paper evaluates the inter-provincial differences of China's regional innovation efficiency from four aspects of technical efficiency, efficiency index change, returns to scale, and projection analysis by using the DEA-Malmquist index method and constructs of the DEA-Tobit random response model to explore the impact of government funding on regional innovation efficiency. The research results show that: (1) The local development of regional innovation efficiency in China is unbalanced, and the level of pure technical efficiency restricts the improvement of innovation efficiency. (2) In the prophase of the scientific and technical development plan, technological progress has led to the growth of total factor productivity, resulting in the formation of scale effect; in the later stage, the scale return shows an overall increasing trend, and the continuous expansion of technological scale and opportunities has improved the regional innovation efficiency. (3) The R & D fiscal and tax subsidies have policy sustainability, and the direct government funding can significantly improve innovation efficiency, while the enterprises investment is opposite, and the pretax additional deduction has a negative but not significant impact. The government should give priority to direct subsidy and supplemented by tax preference, making reasonable policy allocations to expand the policy effect.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Financialization, Government Subsidies, and Manufacturing R&D Investment: Evidence from Listed Companies in China
    Hou, Peng
    Zhou, Mengting
    Xu, Jiaqi
    Liu, Yue
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (22)
  • [32] Accounting Conservatism, R&D Manipulation, and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from China
    Shen, Yi
    Ruan, Qingsong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (15)
  • [33] Financial Development, R&D and Knowledge Production: Empirical Evidence from China
    Jalil, Abdul
    Rauf, Abdul
    Han, Li
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2023, 15 (3) : 14617 - 14642
  • [34] Picking the winner? Empirical evidence on the targeting of R&D subsidies to start-ups
    Cantner, Uwe
    Koesters, Sarah
    SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2012, 39 (04) : 921 - 936
  • [35] Tax cuts and enterprises' R&D intensity: Evidence from a natural experiment in China
    Lan, Fei
    Wang, Wei
    Cao, Qingzi
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2020, 89 : 304 - 314
  • [36] R&D subsidies in permissive and restrictive environment: Evidence from Korea
    Koh, Yumi
    Lee, Gea M.
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2023, 52 (01)
  • [37] The effects of R&D subsidies and network embeddedness on R&D output: evidence from the German biotech industry
    Buchmann, Tobias
    Kaiser, Micha
    INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2019, 26 (03) : 269 - 294
  • [38] The effect of R&D tax credit on innovation: A life cycle analysis
    Chiang, Shuling
    Lee, Picheng
    Anandarajan, Asokan
    INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT, 2012, 14 (04): : 510 - 523
  • [39] Fintech and R&D Evidence from China
    Fan, Chenguang
    Bae, Seongho
    Liu, Yu
    EAST ASIAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2024, 28 (03) : 315 - 357
  • [40] New R&D institution certification policy and urban innovation: evidence from China
    Shui, Yueyao
    Mao, Yihua
    Zhang, Zhao
    Hu, Yuchen
    TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2024, 36 (12) : 4761 - 4775