Mupirocin-based decolonization of Staphylococcus aureus carriers in residents of 2 long-term care facilities:: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

被引:116
作者
Mody, L
Kauffman, CA
McNeil, SA
Galecki, AT
Bradley, SF
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare Syst, Dept Internal Med, Div Geriatr Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Vet Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare Syst, Dept Internal Med, Div Infect Dis, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Inst Gerontol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/379325
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Mupirocin has been used in nursing homes to prevent the spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), despite the lack of controlled trials. In this double-blind, randomized study, the efficacy of intranasal mupirocin ointment versus that of placebo in reducing colonization and preventing infection was assessed among persistent carriers of S. aureus. Twice-daily treatment was given for 2 weeks, with a follow-up period of 6 months. Staphylococcal colonization rates were similar between residents at the Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs (VA) Extended Care Center, Michigan (33%), and residents at a community-based long-term care facility in Ann Arbor (36%), although those at the VA Center carried MRSA more often (58% vs. 35%; P=.017). After treatment, mupirocin had eradicated colonization in 93% of residents, whereas 85% of residents who received placebo remained colonized (P<.001). At day 90 after study entry, 61% of the residents in the mupirocin group remained decolonized. Four patients did not respond to mupirocin therapy; 3 of the 4 had mupirocin-resistant S. aureus strains. Thirteen (86%) of 14 residents who became recolonized had the same pretherapy strain; no strain recovered during relapse was resistant to mupirocin. A trend toward reduction in infections was seen with mupirocin treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:1467 / 1474
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   COX REGRESSION-MODEL FOR COUNTING-PROCESSES - A LARGE SAMPLE STUDY [J].
ANDERSEN, PK ;
GILL, RD .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1982, 10 (04) :1100-1120
[2]  
BOELAERT JR, 1993, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V8, P235
[3]  
BRADLEY SF, 1995, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V16, P354
[4]   METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS - COLONIZATION AND INFECTION IN A LONG-TERM CARE FACILITY [J].
BRADLEY, SF ;
TERPENNING, MS ;
RAMSEY, MA ;
ZARINS, LT ;
JORGENSEN, KA ;
SOTTILE, WS ;
SCHABERG, DR ;
KAUFFMAN, CA .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1991, 115 (06) :417-422
[5]   Staphylococcus aureus infections and antibiotic resistance in older adults [J].
Bradley, SF .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 34 (02) :211-216
[6]  
BRADLEY SF, 1993, INFECT MED, V10, P23
[7]  
CEDERNA JE, 1990, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V11, P13, DOI 10.1086/646072
[8]   STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS NASAL CARRIAGE IN HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS - ITS ROLE IN INFECTION AND APPROACHES TO PROPHYLAXIS [J].
CHOW, JW ;
YU, VL .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1989, 149 (06) :1258-1262
[9]   Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the community:: New battlefronts, or are the battles lost? [J].
Cookson, BD .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 21 (06) :398-403
[10]   GENTAMICIN-METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS - EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CONTAINMENT OF AN OUTBREAK [J].
DACRE, J ;
EMMERSON, AM ;
JENNER, EA .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1986, 7 (02) :130-136