Knowledge Complementarity and Boundary Spanning for Continuous Innovation

被引:0
作者
Shang, Shari S. C. [1 ]
Yao, Chen-Yen [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chengchi Univ, Dept Management Informat Syst, Taipei 11623, Taiwan
[2] Shih Hsin Univ, Dept Business Adm, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
PICMET 2010: TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FOR GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH | 2010年
关键词
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; CUSTOMER KNOWLEDGE; NETWORK STRUCTURE; PERFORMANCE; FIRM; ORGANIZATION; CAPABILITIES; MARKET; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
With the increase of customer demands and rapid development of information and communication technologies, enterprises are facing strenuous competition. Global enterprises are currently engaged in continuous innovation to compete and sustain themselves in the dynamic changing market. Both technological and customer knowledge have been identified as crucial for building knowledge complementarity for delivery of innovation. Most studies in the literature focus on testing for the existence of complementarity between inputs and the effect on output, this study focus on explaining how technological knowledge complements customer knowledge span boundaries to achieve innovation. Based on the concept of boundary spanning, this study is to design a useful instrument to measure knowledge complementarity for continuous innovation. The result is to provide the operationalizable indexes of the scope and depth of knowledge interaction for knowledge complementarity. Finally, different levels of scope and depth of knowledge interaction for knowledge complementarity will affect innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
[2]   Boundary spanning behaviors of expatriates [J].
Au, KY ;
Fukuda, J .
JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2002, 37 (04) :285-296
[3]   Spatial proximity and complementarities in the trading of tacit knowledge [J].
Aydogan, N ;
Lyon, TP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2004, 22 (8-9) :1115-1135
[4]   PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT - PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE-DIRECTIONS [J].
BROWN, SL ;
EISENHARDT, KM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (02) :343-378
[5]  
Buckley P.J., 1999, International Studies of Management and Organization, V29, P80, DOI 10.1080/00208825.1999.11656758
[6]   Why new business development projects fail: Coping with the differences of technological versus market knowledge [J].
Burgers, J. Henri ;
Van Den Bosch, Frans A. J. ;
Volberda, Henk W. .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2008, 41 (01) :55-73
[7]   Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability [J].
Capaldo, Antonio .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (06) :585-608
[8]   A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development [J].
Carlile, PR .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (04) :442-455
[9]   How network competence and network location influence innovation performance [J].
Chiu, Yen Ting Helena .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2009, 24 (1-2) :46-54
[10]  
Cowan R, 2009, ACAD MANAGE REV, V34, P320