Impact of introducing the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria on pregnancy outcomes in Japan

被引:9
作者
Shindo, Ryosuke [1 ]
Aoki, Shigeru [1 ]
Kasai, Junko [1 ]
Saigusa, Yusuke [2 ]
Nakanishi, Sayuri [1 ]
Miyagi, Etsuko [3 ]
机构
[1] Yokohama City Univ, Med Ctr, Perinatal Ctr Matern & Neonates, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[2] Yokohama City Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Biostat, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[3] Yokohama City Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
关键词
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM); International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG); Pregnancy; Japanese; DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; MELLITUS; WOMEN; HYPERGLYCEMIA; CLASSIFICATION; PREVALENCE; COST;
D O I
10.1507/endocrj.EJ19-0279
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To estimate pregnancy complications in women newly diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) according to the new International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria and verify the validity of introducing the IADI'SO criteria in Japan. This retrospective study included data from women with singleton delivery at 22 weeks or later at a tertiary hospital during 2000-2009. We compared pregnancy outcomes between women who would now be diagnosed with GDM according to the IADPSG criteria but not by the old JSOG criteria (1GT group, 11 = 503) and women with normal glucose tolerance according to both the criteria (NGT group, n = 2,789). Multivariate analysis was performed and adjusted for background factors. Maternal age at delivery and Fe-pregnancy BMI were significantly higher in the JOT group than in the NGT group, while gestational weeks at delivery did not differ between the groups. No difference was observed in the rates of GDM-related composite complications (defined as cases with at least one of the following: macrosomia, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, or neonatal respiratory distress syndrome) at 11.9% and 8.8% (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-1.87, p = 0.16). Pregnancy outcomes did not differ significantly between the IGT and NGT groups, except for frequencies of total neonatal admissions at 10.5% and 7.1%, respectively (adjusted OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.12-2.13, p < 0.01).
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 20
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, Obstet Gynecol, V131, pe49, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002501
  • [2] Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With and Without Gestational Diabetes Mellitus According to The International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria
    Bodmer-Roy, Sonja
    Morin, Lucie
    Cousineau, Jocelyne
    Rey, Evelyne
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 120 (04) : 746 - 752
  • [3] CRITERIA FOR SCREENING-TESTS FOR GESTATIONAL DIABETES
    CARPENTER, MW
    COUSTAN, DR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1982, 144 (07) : 768 - 773
  • [4] Introduction of IADPSG Criteria for the Screening and Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Results in Improved Pregnancy Outcomes at a Lower Cost in a Large Cohort of Pregnant Women: The St. Carlos Gestational Diabetes Study
    Duran, Alejandra
    Saenz, Sofia
    Torrejon, Maria J.
    Bordiu, Elena
    del Valle, Laura
    Galindo, Mercedes
    Perez, Noelia
    Herraiz, Miguel A.
    Izquierdo, Nuria
    Rubio, Miguel A.
    Runkle, Isabelle
    Perez-Ferre, Natalia
    Cusihuallpa, Idalia
    Jimenez, Sandra
    Garcia de la Torre, Nuria
    Fernandez, Maria D.
    Montanez, Carmen
    Familiar, Cristina
    Calle-Pascual, Alfonso L.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2014, 37 (09) : 2442 - 2450
  • [5] Impact of using the international association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups criteria in South Auckland: prevalence, interventions and outcomes
    Ekeroma, Alec J.
    Chandran, Gokilavani S.
    McCowan, Lesley
    Ansell, David
    Eagleton, Carl
    Kenealy, Tim
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 55 (01) : 34 - 41
  • [6] Perinatal Outcomes Associated With the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Made by The International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria
    Ethridge, John K., Jr.
    Catalano, Patrick M.
    Waters, Thaddeus P.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 124 (03) : 571 - 578
  • [7] Recommended changes to diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes: Impact on workload
    Flack, Jeff R.
    Ross, Glynis P.
    Ho, Suyen
    McElduff, Aidan
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 50 (05) : 439 - 443
  • [8] Diagnosis and potential management of gestational diabetes mellitus using the International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups criteria
    Fukatsu, Mayumi
    Takai, Yasushi
    Matsunaga, Shigetaka
    Era, Sumiko
    Ono, Yoshihisa
    Saito, Masahiro
    Baba, Kazunori
    Seki, Hiroyuki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2017, 43 (02) : 272 - 280
  • [9] Should the IADPSG criteria be applied when diagnosing early-onset gestational diabetes?
    Hagiwara, Yuko
    Kasai, Junko
    Nakanishi, Sayuri
    Saigusa, Yusuke
    Miyagi, Etsuko
    Aoki, Shigeru
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 140 : 154 - 161
  • [10] HARRIS M, 1979, DIABETES, V28, P1039